05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

emember the route tak<strong>in</strong>g them from the bottom arrow to the top arrow while<br />

avoid<strong>in</strong>g the prohibited black l<strong>in</strong>es. They rehearsed this task five times <strong>in</strong><br />

succession. Participants were given a fresh copy <strong>of</strong> the ‘stepp<strong>in</strong>g-stone’ route<br />

with the prohibited routes removed. Each participant was then required to<br />

complete the route that they had learned. After a break <strong>of</strong> three m<strong>in</strong>utes (filled<br />

with general conversation) participants performed this task once more as a<br />

delayed recall task. They had not been advised that they would be required to<br />

complete a delayed recall assessment. Each correct move was scored one po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

and all <strong>in</strong>correct moves were allocated zero. There were a possible maximum <strong>of</strong><br />

n<strong>in</strong>e accurate moves for each completed route. The immediate recall and<br />

delayed recall scores were comb<strong>in</strong>ed to produce a total possible score <strong>of</strong> 18.<br />

4.2.3 Screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> language abilities<br />

A language screen<strong>in</strong>g test us<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>gle words was compiled by the researcher<br />

and adm<strong>in</strong>istered to each participant (see Appendix 4.5). The items <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />

extracts from published assessments such as the PALPA (Kay et al, 1992) and<br />

picture stimuli from the literature (Snodgrass and Vanderwart, 1980). The<br />

assessment <strong>in</strong>cluded:<br />

- Repetition <strong>of</strong> eight words and eight non-words (PALPA, Kay et al,<br />

1992).<br />

- Auditory lexical decision <strong>of</strong> the above 16 words. This <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

participants hear<strong>in</strong>g words and non-words and <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g if they were<br />

real words or non-words.<br />

- Nam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 12 items from Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980). These<br />

items were selected on the basis that they had high nam<strong>in</strong>g<br />

agreement (98-100%) and high image agreement (greater than 4). Six<br />

<strong>of</strong> these words had high familiarity rat<strong>in</strong>g and six words had low<br />

familiarity rat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

- Read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> eight words and eight non-words (same words as used <strong>in</strong><br />

repetition task above).<br />

104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!