Darley, F.L. (1982) Aphasia. W. B. Saunders. P. A. Philadelphia. Darley, (1972) The efficacy <strong>of</strong> language rehabilitation <strong>in</strong> aphasia. Journal <strong>of</strong> speech and hear<strong>in</strong>g disorders, vol. 37; 3-21. Davis, G. A. (1993) Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> treatment. A survey <strong>of</strong> adult aphasia and related language disorders. Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, N. J. Dawson, D. R. and Chipman, M. (1995) The disablement experienced by traumatically bra<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>jured adults liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the community. Bra<strong>in</strong> Injury, vol. 9; 339-353. Deary, I. J. (2001) Intelligence: a very short <strong>in</strong>troduction. Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press. New York. de Groot, A. M. B. and Kiejzer, R. (2000) What is hard to learn is easy to forget: The roles <strong>of</strong> word concreteness, cognate status, and word frequency <strong>in</strong> foreign-language vocabulary learn<strong>in</strong>g and forgett<strong>in</strong>g. Language Learn<strong>in</strong>g, vol. 50 (1); 1-56. de Riesthal, M. and Wertz, R. T. (2004) Prognosis for aphasia: relationship between selected biographical and behavioural variables and outcome and improvement. Aphasiology, vol. 18 (10); 899-915. Doesborgh, S. J. C., van de Sandt-Koenderman, W. M. E., Dippel, D. W. J., van Harskamp, F., Koudstaal, P. J., and Visch-Br<strong>in</strong>k, E. G. (2002) The impact <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic deficits on verbal communication. Aphasiology, vol.16 (4/5/6); 413-423. Downes, J. J., Kalla, T., Davies, A. D. M., Flynn, A., Ali, H., and Mayes, A. R. (1997) The preexposure technique: a novel method for enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the effects <strong>of</strong> imagery <strong>in</strong> face-name association learn<strong>in</strong>g. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, vol. 7(3); 195-214. Elbert, T., Candia, V. Altenmüller, E., Rau, H., Sterr, A., Rockstroh, B., Pantev, C. and Taub, E. (1998) Alteration <strong>of</strong> digital representations <strong>in</strong> somatosensory cortex <strong>in</strong> focal hand dystonia. NeuroReport, vol. 9; 3571-3575. Elbert, T., Pantev, C., We<strong>in</strong>bruch, C., Rockstroh, B., and Taub, E. (1995) Increased cortical representation <strong>of</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>gers <strong>of</strong> the left hand <strong>in</strong> str<strong>in</strong>g players. Science, vol. 270; 305-307. Ellis-Hill, C. S. and Horn, S. (2000) Change <strong>in</strong> identity and self-concept: a new theoretical approach to recovery follow<strong>in</strong>g a stroke. Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Rehabilitation, vol. 14; 279-287. Ellis, A. W. and Young, A. W. (1996) Human cognitive neuropsychology. Psychology Press, Hove. Enderby, P. and Emerson, J (1995) Does speech and language therapy work? A review <strong>of</strong> the literature. Whurr Publishers Ltd. UK. Enderby, P. and Petheram, B. (2002) Has aphasia therapy been swallowed up? Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Rehabilitation, vol. 16; 604-608. Evans, J. J., Wilson, B. A., Schuri, U., Andrade, J., Baddeley, A., Bruna, O., Canavan, T., Della Sala, S., Green, R., Laaksonen, R., Lorenzi, L., and Taussik, I. (2000) A comparison <strong>of</strong> "errorless" and "trial-and-error" learn<strong>in</strong>g methods for teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals with acquired memory deficits. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, vol. 10 (1); 67-101. Ferguson, A. (1999) Learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> aphasia therapy: it's not so much what you do, but how you do it! Aphasiology, vol. 13 (2); 125-132. Fifer, W. P. and Moon, C. M. (1994) The role <strong>of</strong> mother's voice <strong>in</strong> the organization <strong>of</strong> bra<strong>in</strong> functions <strong>in</strong> the newborn. Acta Paediatrica, vol. 83; 86-93. 293
Fill<strong>in</strong>gham, J. K., Sage, K. and Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2005) Treatment <strong>of</strong> anomia us<strong>in</strong>g errorless versus errorful learn<strong>in</strong>g: are frontal executive skills and feedback important? International Journal <strong>of</strong> Language and Communication Disorders, vol. 40 (4); 505-523. Fill<strong>in</strong>gham, J. K., Hodgson, C., Sage, K. and Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2003) The application <strong>of</strong> errorless learn<strong>in</strong>g to aphasic disorders: a review <strong>of</strong> theory and practice. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, vol. 13 (3); 337-363. Fowler, H. W. and Fowler, F. G. (1990) The concise oxford dictionary. 8 th Edition by R. E. Allen. BCA. London. Frattali, C. M. (1998) Outcomes measurement: def<strong>in</strong>itions, dimensions and perspectives. In Measur<strong>in</strong>g outcomes <strong>in</strong> speech-language pathology C. M. Frattali (Ed), Thieme, New York; 1-27. Freed, D. B., Marshall, R. C., and Phillips, D. S. (1998) Comparison <strong>of</strong> semantically and phonemically based tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g procedures <strong>in</strong> an overlearned nam<strong>in</strong>g task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol. 87; 795-800. Freed, D. B., Marshall, R. C., and Nippold, M. A. (1995) Comparison <strong>of</strong> personalized cue<strong>in</strong>g and provided cue<strong>in</strong>g on the facilitation <strong>of</strong> verbal labell<strong>in</strong>g by aphasic subjects. Journal <strong>of</strong> Speech and Hear<strong>in</strong>g Research, vol. 38; 1081-1090. Ga<strong>in</strong>otti, G. (1997) Emotional, psychological and psychosocial problems <strong>of</strong> aphasic patients: an <strong>in</strong>troduction. Aphasiology, vol. 11 (7); 635-650. Garcia, L. J., Barrette, J., and Laroche, C. (2000) Perceptions <strong>of</strong> the obstacles to work re<strong>in</strong>tegration for persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, vol. 14(3); 269-290. Glosser and Goodglass (1990) Disorders <strong>in</strong> executive control functions among aphasic and other bra<strong>in</strong>-damaged patients. Journal <strong>of</strong> Cl<strong>in</strong>ical and Experimental Neuropsychology, vol. 12; 485-501. Gordon, J. K. (2002) Phonological neighborhood effects <strong>in</strong> aphasic speech errors: spontaneous and structured contexts. Bra<strong>in</strong> and Language, vol. 82; 113-145. Gordon, J. K. (1999) Can learn<strong>in</strong>g theory teach us about aphasia therapy? Aphasiology, vol.13 (2); 134-140. Greener, J., Enderby, P. and Whurr, R. (2005) Speech and language therapy for aphasia follow<strong>in</strong>g stroke. Cochrane Database <strong>of</strong> Systemic Reviews (3), Cochrane Stroke Group. Grossberg, S. (1999) The l<strong>in</strong>k between bra<strong>in</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g, attention, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 8; 1-44. Grossman, M. and Carey, S. (1987) Selective word-learn<strong>in</strong>g deficits <strong>in</strong> aphasia. Bra<strong>in</strong> and Language, vol. 32; 306-324. Harley, T. (2004) Does cognitive neuropsychology have a future? Cognitive Neuropsychology, vol. 21 (1); 3-16 Harley, T. (2001) The psychology <strong>of</strong> language: from data to theory. 2 nd Edition. Psychology Press. Hove. Hebb, D. O. (1949) The organization <strong>of</strong> behaviour: a neuropsychological theory Wiley, New York. Helm-Estabrooks, N. (2002) Cognition and aphasia: a discussion and a study. Journal <strong>of</strong> Communication Disorders, vol. 35(2); 171-186. Helm-Estabrooks, N. (2001) Cognitive L<strong>in</strong>guistic Quick Test. The Psychological Corporation. USA. 294
- Page 1 and 2:
An Investigation into the Ability o
- Page 3 and 4:
Abstract Recent studies have establ
- Page 5 and 6:
Christine Malcolm (Chief Speech and
- Page 7 and 8:
2.6.2.1 Lesion size and site 37 2.6
- Page 9 and 10:
3.6.1.2 Number and type of items to
- Page 11 and 12:
4.8 Chapter summary 132 Chapter 5 T
- Page 13 and 14:
5.9.1.1 Personal attributes 176 5.9
- Page 15 and 16:
5.15.1.1 Personal attributes 208 5.
- Page 17 and 18:
6.3.3.5 The impact of clock drawing
- Page 19 and 20:
Appendices 2.1 Main representative
- Page 21 and 22:
5.2 Raw and percentage scores for n
- Page 23 and 24:
Figures 2i Cognitive neuropsycholog
- Page 25 and 26:
Younger people who are having and s
- Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 2 Review of the literature
- Page 29 and 30:
sentences. As aphasia also affects
- Page 31 and 32:
continue to experience significant
- Page 33 and 34:
noted that there were three areas t
- Page 35 and 36:
natural reaction to the loss of abi
- Page 37 and 38:
2.3.3 Impact of aphasia on the fami
- Page 39 and 40:
facets of a person’s life as well
- Page 41 and 42:
with the literature regarding the l
- Page 43 and 44:
Rehabilitation is not thought to al
- Page 45 and 46:
everything that we learn and experi
- Page 47 and 48:
eorganisation in hemiplegic stroke
- Page 49 and 50:
(Kasten and Sabel, 1995) and replic
- Page 51 and 52:
1998), tingling, itching or painful
- Page 53 and 54:
Emission Tomography (PET) scans ana
- Page 55 and 56:
ehabilitation, function can be limi
- Page 57 and 58:
Studies have not always found age t
- Page 59 and 60:
larger intracranial capacity could
- Page 61 and 62:
permanent loss of particular skills
- Page 63 and 64:
depression in people with severe ap
- Page 65 and 66:
maintenance of permanent records of
- Page 67 and 68:
intensity aphasia rehabilitation wa
- Page 69 and 70:
2.7 CURRENT THEORETICAL ACCOUNTS OF
- Page 71 and 72:
people with apparently similar char
- Page 73 and 74:
Additionally, harmful or redundant
- Page 75 and 76:
information about a word (Harley, 2
- Page 77 and 78:
(as in semantic dementia) as well a
- Page 79 and 80:
esearchers (Breedin et al., 1998; W
- Page 81 and 82:
As many adults have acquired a wide
- Page 83 and 84:
healthy individuals as mentioned ab
- Page 85 and 86:
et al. (2001) evaluated the ability
- Page 87 and 88:
of new vocabulary where both the wo
- Page 89 and 90:
syllables in each word, therefore t
- Page 91 and 92:
vocabulary; facilitate the demonstr
- Page 93 and 94:
methodology developed and used in t
- Page 95 and 96:
Chapter 3 Preliminary Studies 3.1 I
- Page 97 and 98:
for the main investigation by the n
- Page 99 and 100:
3.2.1.4 Delayed recall Approximatel
- Page 101 and 102:
written recall assessment task (par
- Page 103 and 104:
indicates a large reduction of item
- Page 105 and 106:
ehearsal taking place prior to the
- Page 107 and 108:
one were discussed with each partic
- Page 109 and 110:
Graph 3.2 Comparison of number of i
- Page 111 and 112:
As with preliminary study one, part
- Page 113 and 114:
during the training session, some p
- Page 115 and 116:
3.5 PRELIMINARY STUDY FOUR This stu
- Page 117 and 118:
Fifty four percent of participants
- Page 119 and 120:
preliminary studies the British Nat
- Page 121 and 122:
where main investigation participan
- Page 123 and 124:
perhaps reduce the number of items
- Page 125 and 126:
preliminary studies as described in
- Page 127 and 128:
emember the route taking them from
- Page 129 and 130:
4.3 TRAINING SESSION PROCEDURE Each
- Page 131 and 132:
4.3.2.1 Training of stimuli: phonol
- Page 133 and 134:
assessments was administered both i
- Page 135 and 136:
to match the name and skill present
- Page 137 and 138:
4.4.3 Results of P1’s post-traini
- Page 139 and 140:
Table 4.4 Pilot Study One Total raw
- Page 141 and 142:
session. This reflected the general
- Page 143 and 144:
4.4.5 Summary of pilot study one Pi
- Page 145 and 146:
4.5.2 Results of P2’s performance
- Page 147 and 148:
P2 recalled 14 (70%) of the new wor
- Page 149 and 150:
demonstrate this learning during im
- Page 151 and 152:
4.6.3 Methodological issues A numbe
- Page 153 and 154:
would be asked not to repeat the wo
- Page 155 and 156:
4.8 CHAPTER SUMMARY The three pilot
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 5 Main Investigation 5.1 IN
- Page 159 and 160:
- The medical stability of particip
- Page 161 and 162:
The methodology for the training an
- Page 163 and 164:
(i.e. C1, P3 and C2) remained the t
- Page 165 and 166:
the immediate recall was not the sa
- Page 167 and 168:
Table 5.5 Characteristics of error
- Page 169 and 170:
scores (Zigmond and Snaith, 1983) a
- Page 171 and 172:
expected that younger participants
- Page 173 and 174:
5.4.2.3 Severity of aphasia While t
- Page 175 and 176:
5.5 PARTICIPANT C1 Participant C1
- Page 177 and 178:
SPOKEN WORD PICTURE WRITTEN WORD Au
- Page 179 and 180:
written form again without the aid
- Page 181 and 182:
vocabulary than younger participant
- Page 183 and 184:
was non-fluent with many repetition
- Page 185 and 186:
emembering 49% of information origi
- Page 187 and 188:
5.7.1.1 Personal attributes C2 was
- Page 189 and 190:
GOB pathways). C2’s speech was ch
- Page 191 and 192:
assessment tasks (see Table 5.2), w
- Page 193 and 194:
5.8.1.1 Personal attributes C3 was
- Page 195 and 196:
C3’s narration of the Cinderella
- Page 197 and 198:
errors with six out of the 20 new w
- Page 199 and 200:
5.9.1.1 Personal attributes C4 was
- Page 201 and 202:
5.9.1.4 Rehearsal and consolidation
- Page 203 and 204:
achieved 100% recognition on the li
- Page 205 and 206:
5.10.1.1 Personal attributes C5 was
- Page 207 and 208:
any other fictional stories so he w
- Page 209 and 210:
the reading task. C5 matched eight
- Page 211 and 212:
5.11.1.1 Personal attributes C6 was
- Page 213 and 214:
some word-finding difficulties with
- Page 215 and 216:
5.12 PARTICIPANT C7 Participant C7
- Page 217 and 218:
pathways), spell words and non-word
- Page 219 and 220:
(reading) words she made 15 false p
- Page 221 and 222:
5.13.1.1 Personal attributes C8 was
- Page 223 and 224:
and PLC pathways). C8’s speech wa
- Page 225 and 226:
5.14 PARTICIPANT C9 Participant C9
- Page 227 and 228:
C9’s data (see Table 5.26 and Fig
- Page 229 and 230:
assessments indicated that she had
- Page 231 and 232:
5.15.1.1 Personal attributes C10 wa
- Page 233 and 234:
naming. C10 had some difficulties c
- Page 235 and 236:
5.16 PARTICIPANT C11 Participant C1
- Page 237 and 238:
SPOKEN WORD PICTURE WRITTEN WORD Au
- Page 239 and 240:
Table 5.31 C11’s detailed perform
- Page 241 and 242:
influencing factors (for example, a
- Page 243 and 244:
each participant’s relevant data,
- Page 245 and 246:
Table 5.32 Hierarchical cluster ana
- Page 247 and 248:
for months post-stroke, severity of
- Page 249 and 250:
Table 5.33 Correlation co-efficient
- Page 251 and 252:
Table 5.35 Correlation co-efficient
- Page 253 and 254:
Table 5.39 Correlation co-efficient
- Page 255 and 256:
ecency and primacy effect, however,
- Page 257 and 258:
drawing skills and the ability to l
- Page 259 and 260:
with the creation of new neuronal c
- Page 261 and 262:
5.8.2.1). Secondly, the participant
- Page 263 and 264:
6.3.1.1 The impact of age on the le
- Page 265 and 266: education that an individual experi
- Page 267 and 268: unethical, even perhaps illegal, to
- Page 269 and 270: assessment and treatment of emotion
- Page 271 and 272: theories on the negative effects of
- Page 273 and 274: (CLQT) was developed as a screening
- Page 275 and 276: 6.3.3.2 The impact of memory on the
- Page 277 and 278: (executive scores of moderate, mild
- Page 279 and 280: 320). Additionally, the CLQT indica
- Page 281 and 282: 6.3.4.1 Pre-training language scree
- Page 283 and 284: abilities of each participant and a
- Page 285 and 286: person with aphasia only ever produ
- Page 287 and 288: 6.4.2 Methodology As previous resea
- Page 289 and 290: assessing the learning of new vocab
- Page 291 and 292: provided flexibility not only for s
- Page 293 and 294: presentation. It was proposed that
- Page 295 and 296: participants also lexicalised the n
- Page 297 and 298: module and how it communicates with
- Page 299 and 300: theory of rehabilitation and in rel
- Page 301 and 302: experience in different ways and ch
- Page 303 and 304: upon language rehabilitation, for e
- Page 305 and 306: the investigation of people with po
- Page 307 and 308: Further statistical analyses with a
- Page 309 and 310: extend the examination of the abili
- Page 311 and 312: task), severity of aphasia and amou
- Page 313 and 314: References Alexander, M. P. (1994)
- Page 315: Candia, V., Schafer, Th., Taub, E.,
- Page 319 and 320: Howard and Hatfield (1987) Aphasia
- Page 321 and 322: Linebaugh, C. W. (1999) Merging the
- Page 323 and 324: Nation, I. S. P. (1983) Teaching an
- Page 325 and 326: Scheibel, A., Conrad, T., Perdue, S
- Page 327 and 328: Warrington, E. K. and McCarthy (198
- Page 329 and 330: Appendix 3.1 Preliminary study one:
- Page 331 and 332: Appendix 3.2 (continued) Preliminar
- Page 333 and 334: Appendix 3.4a Preliminary study two
- Page 335 and 336: Appendix 3.6 Stimuli used for the m
- Page 337 and 338: Appendix 3.6 (continued) Stimuli us
- Page 339 and 340: Appendix 4.1 Methods of learning ne
- Page 341 and 342: Appendix 4.2 Hospital Anxiety and D
- Page 343 and 344: Appendix 4.2 (Continued) Hospital A
- Page 345 and 346: Appendix 4.4 Non-linguistic learnin
- Page 347 and 348: Appendix 4.5 Language screening ass
- Page 349 and 350: Appendix 4.6 Familiar, trained and
- Page 351 and 352: Appendix 4.8 Examples of written an
- Page 353 and 354: APPENDIX 5.2 Participant consent fo
- Page 355 and 356: Appendix 5.3 (Continued) Narrations
- Page 357 and 358: Appendix 5.3 (Continued) Narrations
- Page 359 and 360: Appendix 5.4 (continued) Hierarchic
- Page 361 and 362: Appendix 5.4 (continued) Hierarchic
- Page 363 and 364: Appendix 5.4 (continued) Hierarchic
- Page 365 and 366: Appendix 5.5 (continued) Group corr
- Page 367 and 368:
Appendix 5.5 (continued) Group corr
- Page 369:
Appendix 5.7 Total recall of tasks