05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

weekly speech and language therapy. P3 lived with his wife and was fully mobile<br />

with no residual paresis but had post-stroke epilepsy which was managed by<br />

medication. He was a retired pharmacist who had completed 20 years <strong>in</strong><br />

education (encompass<strong>in</strong>g two undergraduate degrees and a post-graduate<br />

degree). P3 described his language difficulties as frustrat<strong>in</strong>g, as some days his<br />

speech was fluent and on others he was unable to speak <strong>in</strong>telligibly. He stated<br />

that he knew the words he wanted to say, but found great difficulty pronounc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

them. He reported that he did not experience any memory process<strong>in</strong>g difficulties<br />

and his read<strong>in</strong>g and writ<strong>in</strong>g skills, while impaired, were gradually improv<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

4.6.2 Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and assessment sessions<br />

P3 was eager to succeed and showed consistent attention to all procedures. He<br />

followed all <strong>in</strong>structions easily and completed all tasks with no apparent<br />

difficulties. P3 participated <strong>in</strong> the pre-tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g screen<strong>in</strong>g assessments, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

and immediate recall <strong>of</strong> all four sessions, and also delayed recall tasks. He<br />

reported these procedures to be straightforward and had no difficulties with the<br />

<strong>in</strong>structions or tasks.<br />

Task<br />

Pre-tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g basel<strong>in</strong>e assessments<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g session one<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g session two<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g session three<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g session four<br />

Delayed assessments<br />

Table 4.10<br />

Pilot Study Three<br />

Tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> all sessions for P3<br />

Total time<br />

60 m<strong>in</strong>utes<br />

60 m<strong>in</strong>utes<br />

60 m<strong>in</strong>utes<br />

50 m<strong>in</strong>utes<br />

65 m<strong>in</strong>utes<br />

50 m<strong>in</strong>utes<br />

P3 utilised the full 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes allotted for <strong>in</strong>dependent learn<strong>in</strong>g for each session<br />

and the length <strong>of</strong> time required for all tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and assessments is presented by<br />

session <strong>in</strong> Table 4.10. A number <strong>of</strong> methodological issues arose follow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and assessment sessions and are now discussed.<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!