05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.12.1.1 Personal attributes<br />

C7 was aged 51;03 at the time <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>vestigation and was one <strong>of</strong> the older<br />

participants. She experienced 12 years <strong>in</strong> education and worked <strong>in</strong> a factory<br />

requir<strong>in</strong>g basic literacy skills and good attention and concentration skills such as<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g methodical and dexterous (www.learndirect-advice.co.uk - pr<strong>of</strong>ile 811).<br />

C7’s self-rat<strong>in</strong>g for anxiety and depression was considered to be with<strong>in</strong> normal<br />

limits and she was 29 months post-stroke. It was predicted that be<strong>in</strong>g one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

older participants and consideration <strong>of</strong> her level <strong>of</strong> education and skill <strong>in</strong><br />

employment C7 would not learn as much new vocabulary as younger more<br />

educated and skilled participants.<br />

5.12.1.2 Cognitive abilities and the capacity to learn<br />

The cognitive sub-tests <strong>of</strong> the CLQT <strong>in</strong>dicated that C7’s cognitive abilities were<br />

with<strong>in</strong> normal limits with the exception <strong>of</strong> memory, which <strong>in</strong>dicated severely<br />

impaired memory. Such impairment would predict a difficulty learn<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

recall<strong>in</strong>g the new vocabulary (see section 2.6.3.3) however, as with C2 (see<br />

section 5.7.1.2) it was felt that this score did not give an accurate reflection <strong>of</strong><br />

C7’s memory due to her severe aphasia. Additionally, she demonstrated the<br />

capacity to recall newly learned <strong>in</strong>formation by recall<strong>in</strong>g 94% <strong>of</strong> the non-l<strong>in</strong>guistic<br />

task for both immediate and delayed recall.<br />

5.12.1.3 Severity <strong>of</strong> aphasia<br />

The language sub-test <strong>of</strong> the CLQT suggested that C7 had severe language<br />

difficulties. Her language screen<strong>in</strong>g scores are displayed <strong>in</strong> Table 5.22 for each<br />

task and mapped on to a cognitive neuropsychology model <strong>in</strong> Figure 5ix below.<br />

C7’s data (see Table 5.22 and Figure 5ix) <strong>in</strong>dicated that she had a number <strong>of</strong><br />

language difficulties at s<strong>in</strong>gle word level. While she could recognise spoken and<br />

written s<strong>in</strong>gle words C7 had severe expressive aphasia affect<strong>in</strong>g her ability to<br />

repeat and read aloud non-words (suggest<strong>in</strong>g impairment to APC, POB, an LPC<br />

193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!