05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Additionally, harmful or redundant therapy tools/ methods that could promote<br />

maladaptive neuronal connections could be elim<strong>in</strong>ated. It is also possible that<br />

both processes could be happen<strong>in</strong>g simultaneously dur<strong>in</strong>g the therapeutic<br />

process i.e. formation <strong>of</strong> new representations and access<strong>in</strong>g already held<br />

representations. If a theory <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation <strong>in</strong>corporated theories <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

then it would be important to identify any constra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g factors impact<strong>in</strong>g upon<br />

this new learn<strong>in</strong>g experienced by people with aphasia. It is possible that those<br />

identified constra<strong>in</strong>ts on learn<strong>in</strong>g could also be the same factors that are thought<br />

to <strong>in</strong>fluence language recovery (see section 2.6). Additionally, as people are<br />

thought to learn <strong>in</strong> different ways it may be that different learn<strong>in</strong>g techniques<br />

would facilitate language restitution <strong>in</strong> different <strong>in</strong>dividuals.<br />

However it has not yet been adequately proven that new learn<strong>in</strong>g is occurr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the therapeutic process. Gordon (1999) highlights the problem <strong>of</strong> various<br />

term<strong>in</strong>ologies with<strong>in</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g theories, however, it must first be established that<br />

new learn<strong>in</strong>g is occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> therapy. In order to address this it must first be<br />

established that people with aphasia can demonstrate new learn<strong>in</strong>g despite<br />

language impairment. This <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong>tends to address this question.<br />

However, <strong>in</strong> order to ensure that the <strong>in</strong>vestigation measures the ability <strong>of</strong><br />

participants with aphasia to learn new language-related <strong>in</strong>formation rather than<br />

access<strong>in</strong>g old memory traces through other methods, their ability to learn new<br />

vocabulary will be assessed (i.e. the acquisition <strong>of</strong> new knowledge <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

novel words). If adults with aphasia are unable to demonstrate the learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

new vocabulary then it suggests that aphasia therapy facilitates the re-access<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> previously known <strong>in</strong>formation. Therefore, the tools and methods used <strong>in</strong><br />

language therapy sessions should reflect this. If however, adults with aphasia<br />

demonstrate that they can learn new vocabulary then the therapy tools and<br />

methods could <strong>in</strong>corporate novel methods to facilitate this new learn<strong>in</strong>g (e.g. can<br />

we teach the old words as new words encourag<strong>in</strong>g new pathways to be laid<br />

down?). As previously discussed (see section 2.5 and subhead<strong>in</strong>gs) learn<strong>in</strong>g or<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!