05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

participant’s language impairment. The pre-tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g language screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

assessments employed a number <strong>of</strong> different tasks generally considered to<br />

target the various modules and pathways encompassed by the cognitive<br />

neuropsychology model (see Appendix 2.1). It was considered that the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> participants on these language assessments provided adequate<br />

data about the abilities to process s<strong>in</strong>gle words. This data was considered to<br />

differentiate participants <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> severity <strong>of</strong> aphasia and <strong>in</strong>dicated specific<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> difficulty for language comprehension and expression (spoken and<br />

written). However it must be noted that for some participants the extent <strong>of</strong> their<br />

language difficulties was not apparent with s<strong>in</strong>gle word responses alone but was<br />

highlighted when connected speech was observed, for example <strong>in</strong> the narration<br />

<strong>of</strong> the C<strong>in</strong>derella story. Therefore the cognitive neuropsychology approach was<br />

useful <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g severity <strong>of</strong> aphasia <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle word process<strong>in</strong>g rather<br />

than overall severity. However as the focus <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>vestigation was on s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

word acquisition and assessments only required s<strong>in</strong>gle word responses it was<br />

considered appropriate and adequate for this <strong>in</strong>vestigation.<br />

6.5.2 Support the methodology for learn<strong>in</strong>g procedure<br />

The tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g procedure <strong>in</strong>corporated a number <strong>of</strong> approaches to facilitate the<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the new vocabulary – pre-exposure and self-judgement techniques,<br />

which facilitated staggered learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the new words and an errorless learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

approach. Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g tasks endeavoured to teach participants <strong>in</strong>formation about<br />

the new word forms and mean<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> both spoken and written format, as well as<br />

their associations with already known words. The use <strong>of</strong> the cognitive<br />

neuropsychology model for these processes is described <strong>in</strong> Chapter 2 (see<br />

Figure 2i <strong>in</strong> 2.9.3) and Chapter 4 (see Figure 4ii and section 4.7). The model<br />

provided a useful architecture for the procedure and for the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

new vocabulary (for example, the pronunciation, spell<strong>in</strong>g and syllable structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> the new word forms, and word mean<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g the visual image <strong>of</strong> the<br />

word and associated mean<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> skills, habitat and food source). The model<br />

267

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!