05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4<br />

Pilot studies: f<strong>in</strong>alisation <strong>of</strong> methodology<br />

for the ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation<br />

4.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The prelim<strong>in</strong>ary studies (Chapter 3) shaped the design <strong>of</strong> the stimuli and the<br />

methodology for the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and assessment <strong>of</strong> new vocabulary learn<strong>in</strong>g for the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation. Normative data for the learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the new stimuli was<br />

acquired from 75 adults with no history <strong>of</strong> bra<strong>in</strong> damage, cognitive or language<br />

difficulties. As it was established that the 20 novel words were orig<strong>in</strong>al by all<br />

participants there was no requirement for untra<strong>in</strong>ed stimuli for control purposes<br />

<strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation. The prelim<strong>in</strong>ary studies also <strong>in</strong>dicated that there was<br />

no requirement for a control group due to the wide range <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g abilities by<br />

the normal population. Additionally, the ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation addresses the<br />

question <strong>of</strong> whether adults with aphasia are able to demonstrate the learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

new vocabulary, which is unknown to date, rather than compar<strong>in</strong>g their capacity<br />

to learn with the normal population. Optimal learn<strong>in</strong>g strategies used by<br />

prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study participants were <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> prelim<strong>in</strong>ary studies one and<br />

two. As no one strategy was found to be effective for all participants it was<br />

decided that a number <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g strategies would be shown to the participants<br />

with aphasia <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation, who would then choose their own<br />

preferred learn<strong>in</strong>g strategy.<br />

This chapter describes the f<strong>in</strong>al development <strong>of</strong> the methodology for the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation. The completed methodology aimed firstly to facilitate the learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> the novel word forms and their mean<strong>in</strong>gs dur<strong>in</strong>g the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g period and<br />

secondly, to structure the assessment <strong>of</strong> this new learn<strong>in</strong>g to enable participants<br />

with aphasia to demonstrate any <strong>in</strong>formation that they may learn. The procedure<br />

(see section 4.2 and 4.3) was therefore compiled <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g theories <strong>of</strong><br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g, the cognitive neuropsychological approach and the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!