05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

participant pr<strong>of</strong>iles (see section 5.5 – 5.16). The delayed recall totals for each<br />

participant are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 5.3 below. Participants were listed accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to their performance <strong>in</strong> descend<strong>in</strong>g order. The raw scores <strong>in</strong>dicate that people<br />

with aphasia could reta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation from the newly learned vocabulary three to<br />

five days follow<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Table 5.3<br />

Raw and percentage scores for delayed recall tasks (10 participants)<br />

Participant<br />

Raw score<br />

(total = 320)<br />

Percentage correct<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

items reta<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />

Immediate recall<br />

C1 263.5 82 83<br />

C3 210.5 66 80<br />

C2 188 59 66<br />

P3* 169 53 49*<br />

C5 159 50 80<br />

C4 144 45 67<br />

C6 132 41 70<br />

C7 110.5 35 71<br />

C8 102 32 66<br />

C9 56 17.5 74<br />

*as P3 completed the read<strong>in</strong>g aloud and picture-syllable match<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the delayed recall<br />

assessment only (4.6.3), these figures were deducted from his scores <strong>in</strong> Table 5.2 (i.e.<br />

169 – 16 – 17 / 280) to enable computation <strong>of</strong> percentage reta<strong>in</strong>ed from immediate recall.<br />

As with the immediate recall scores there was wide variation <strong>in</strong> performance,<br />

with the percentage achieved rang<strong>in</strong>g from 17.5% (raw score 56 from a possible<br />

maximum score <strong>of</strong> 320) to 82% (raw score 263.5 from a possible maximum<br />

score <strong>of</strong> 320) correct. The percentage <strong>of</strong> items recalled from immediate recall<br />

assessments was compared with the <strong>in</strong>formation recalled from the delayed<br />

recall assessments. The percentage <strong>of</strong> reta<strong>in</strong>ed learn<strong>in</strong>g ranged from 49% to<br />

83% <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation. This <strong>in</strong>dicated that much <strong>of</strong> this learn<strong>in</strong>g was reta<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />

the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sessions. It was observed that the rank<strong>in</strong>g position <strong>of</strong> participants <strong>in</strong><br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!