05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

participants also lexicalised the newly learned words on occasion, for example,<br />

target – [sneˆtl], response = [sneˆl], target – [sˆlva®k], response = [sˆlv\®]. Overall<br />

participants were aware <strong>of</strong> these errors but unable to <strong>in</strong>hibit the familiar word<br />

responses or unable to <strong>of</strong>fer alternatives. Although C1 and C6 made lexical<br />

errors on basel<strong>in</strong>e measures they did not present with this characteristic for the<br />

newly learned words, suggest<strong>in</strong>g perhaps that these words had well established<br />

lexical representations with strong activation patterns that did not compete with<br />

other similar lexical representations. Ellis and Young (1996) report rapid<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction between the phonological output lexicon and phonemic output buffer<br />

and when one or more <strong>of</strong> these pathways are impaired such errors occur.<br />

Although the corpus is small, these <strong>in</strong>stances <strong>of</strong> non-word lexicalisation <strong>in</strong> the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation are consistent with the literature regard<strong>in</strong>g phonological<br />

neighbourhood effects where phonologically related lexical items (usually<br />

considered to differ from the target word by one phoneme) are assumed to<br />

compete for lexical selection result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>correct choice <strong>of</strong> word (Gordon,<br />

2002; Luce and Pisoni, 1998) and words with similar sounds are activated<br />

simultaneously <strong>in</strong>terfer<strong>in</strong>g with lexical selection (Ellis and Young, 1996). Where<br />

participants presented with perseveration <strong>of</strong> phonemes or syllables <strong>in</strong> their<br />

responses to already familiar words (four participants) this was also a feature <strong>of</strong><br />

their responses for the newly learned words.<br />

6.5.5 Some support and criticisms <strong>of</strong> the cognitive neuropsychological<br />

model<br />

The cognitive neuropsychological model proved useful for the current<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that it is a robust method for identify<strong>in</strong>g characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

new vocabulary learn<strong>in</strong>g at s<strong>in</strong>gle word level, particularly for those <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

where spoken or written demonstration <strong>of</strong> this learn<strong>in</strong>g is hampered by<br />

phonological or orthographic impairment. One criticism <strong>of</strong> the cognitive<br />

neuropsychological model is that it is an <strong>of</strong>f-l<strong>in</strong>e method <strong>of</strong> represent<strong>in</strong>g data,<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g a snapshot <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>in</strong>gle word process<strong>in</strong>g abilities at one moment <strong>in</strong><br />

272

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!