05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.3.4.1 Pre-tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g language screen<strong>in</strong>g assessments<br />

The <strong>in</strong>itial severity <strong>of</strong> aphasia is considered to be a prognostic factor <strong>in</strong> its<br />

recovery (see section 2.6.3.1) however this <strong>in</strong>formation was not available for this<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation. Instead the severity <strong>of</strong> aphasia <strong>of</strong> each participant was measured<br />

immediately prior to participation <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation and the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

aphasia severity was assessed us<strong>in</strong>g this data. The language ability <strong>of</strong><br />

participants was assessed us<strong>in</strong>g the sub-test <strong>of</strong> the CLQT (Helm-Estabrooks,<br />

2001) and data provided by the pre-tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g language screen<strong>in</strong>g assessments<br />

(see section 4.2.3). There was a range <strong>of</strong> severity <strong>of</strong> aphasia among<br />

participants. The CLQT language sub-test data <strong>in</strong>dicated language process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

abilities rang<strong>in</strong>g from with<strong>in</strong> normal limits to severely aphasic. The range <strong>of</strong><br />

aphasia scores from the language screen<strong>in</strong>g assessments varied between 94%<br />

(raw score <strong>of</strong> 124.5 out <strong>of</strong> a possible maximum <strong>of</strong> 133) to 51% (raw score <strong>of</strong> 68)<br />

– the lower scores <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g more language severity. It was speculated that<br />

participants with more severely impaired language abilities would learn fewer<br />

new words than their less severely aphasic peers. The hypo<strong>thesis</strong> ‘severity <strong>of</strong><br />

aphasia is positively correlated with the recall <strong>of</strong> new vocabulary’ was supported<br />

for immediate recall by both the CLQT (r=+.605; p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!