05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>of</strong> lesion are thought to be <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sically l<strong>in</strong>ked with the <strong>in</strong>itial severity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

language impairment. A further impact<strong>in</strong>g factor on recovery appears to be the<br />

<strong>in</strong>itial functional severity <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> variables follow<strong>in</strong>g the stroke. These<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude the <strong>in</strong>itial severity <strong>of</strong> aphasia, which appears to be the most strongly<br />

supported impact<strong>in</strong>g factor on recovery. Emotional disturbances follow<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

stroke (especially post-stroke depression) also impact upon the performance <strong>of</strong><br />

an <strong>in</strong>dividual and puts the person at risk <strong>of</strong> further cognitive difficulties. Cognitive<br />

impairment (<strong>in</strong> particular, attention, memory and executive function) is a<br />

complex factor that <strong>of</strong>ten co-exists with aphasia and can impact upon its<br />

recovery.<br />

The rehabilitation process also has a part to play <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g recovery <strong>of</strong><br />

language. As discussed, although aphasia therapy is considered to be<br />

efficacious (see section 2.4.1) the process underp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g rehabilitation is not fully<br />

understood. However, the <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation and its tim<strong>in</strong>g are factors that<br />

have been shown to impact upon the recovery process (see section 2.6.4). As<br />

various efficacy studies have employed different methods for assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

aphasia severity, different stimuli and therapy procedures for rehabilitation and<br />

also various measures <strong>of</strong> outcome and recovery, it is not clear exactly what part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the therapeutic process causes or facilitates the recovery <strong>of</strong> language<br />

function. Even when people receive the same therapeutic <strong>in</strong>tervention they do<br />

not always appear to have the same outcomes (Best and Nickels, 2000). If<br />

therapists are to adopt the best rehabilitation methods, elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>effective<br />

ones that promote maladaptive connections (Enderby and Emerson, 1995), the<br />

processes underly<strong>in</strong>g rehabilitation must be <strong>in</strong>vestigated.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!