05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(as <strong>in</strong> semantic dementia) as well as difficulties access<strong>in</strong>g representations<br />

stored <strong>in</strong> the semantic system (word-f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g errors from people with aphasia). As<br />

with the lexicon there has also been much discussion about how many semantic<br />

systems there are. The <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> the presentation <strong>of</strong> semantic categoryspecific<br />

deficits <strong>in</strong> some people with bra<strong>in</strong> damage is controversial (Caramazza,<br />

1998). Studies have reported dissociations, <strong>in</strong> particular between animate and<br />

<strong>in</strong>animate objects (Warr<strong>in</strong>gton and Shallice, 1984; Silveri and Ga<strong>in</strong>otti, 1988)<br />

and liv<strong>in</strong>g and non-liv<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs (Warr<strong>in</strong>gton and McCarthy, 1983; Hillis and<br />

Caramazza, 1991). There are those who advocate the unimodal semantic<br />

system (for example, Caramazza, Hillis, Rapp and Romani, 1990; Hillis, Rapp,<br />

Romani, and Caramazza, 1990) where there is one central store <strong>of</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

can be accessed by all modalities. Others advocate multiple semantic systems<br />

as evidenced by category-specific semantic disorders. However Capitani,<br />

Laiacona, Mahon and Caramazza (2003) reviewed evidence <strong>in</strong> favour <strong>of</strong><br />

category-specific deficits and reported that the existence <strong>of</strong> reliable cases which<br />

could <strong>in</strong>dicate multi-semantic systems was not very strong.<br />

2.8.3 Grammatical behaviour <strong>of</strong> words<br />

Inherent <strong>in</strong> words are different grammatical markers, which <strong>in</strong>dicate how a word<br />

should be used with<strong>in</strong> a given sentence – nouns (words for objects), proper<br />

nouns (words nam<strong>in</strong>g people or places), verbs (words describ<strong>in</strong>g actions) and<br />

function words (for example, he, she, the). Although not universally accepted,<br />

category-specific deficits have also been described for grammatical classes <strong>of</strong><br />

words such as verbs and nouns (Daniele et al., 1994). Some <strong>in</strong>vestigations have<br />

suggested that they are dissociated anatomically (Daniele et al., 1994) and<br />

functionally as people with aphasia <strong>of</strong>ten have more difficulty retriev<strong>in</strong>g verbs<br />

than nouns (Breed<strong>in</strong>, Saffran, and Schwartz, 1998; Caramazza and Hillis, 1991)<br />

suggest<strong>in</strong>g that these word classes behave differently. Warburton, Wise, Price,<br />

Weiller, Hadar and Ramsay (1996) also found dissociations between verbs and<br />

nouns with healthy people from PET scans. However, no differences <strong>in</strong> neural<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!