05.06.2014 Views

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of - Queen Margaret University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sentence format. Secondly, the sample was simply to further describe the<br />

particular language difficulties that participants with aphasia presented with,<br />

which may not be obvious with s<strong>in</strong>gle word utterances. Participants with aphasia<br />

would be asked to narrate the story <strong>of</strong> C<strong>in</strong>derella <strong>in</strong> spoken and written format.<br />

4.4.4.3 Consolidation <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The written and auditory stimuli used dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dependent learn<strong>in</strong>g phase<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed with P1 between the immediate and delayed recall phase to allow her<br />

to rehearse and consolidate her learn<strong>in</strong>g. This aimed to reduce the ‘recency<br />

effect’ phenomenon where a person was most likely to recall the last items that<br />

they have been exposed to, which <strong>in</strong> this study would be the five creatures from<br />

session four. However it was not possible to control for the time <strong>in</strong>terval between<br />

the f<strong>in</strong>al practise <strong>of</strong> the stimuli by P1 and the actual delayed assessment. The<br />

function <strong>of</strong> the delayed assessment was to assess the retention <strong>of</strong> the learned<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation by each participant follow<strong>in</strong>g a break from the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sessions.<br />

Therefore, if a participant practised the stimuli immediately prior to the<br />

assessment it could not categorically be called ‘delayed’ recall. Because <strong>of</strong> this<br />

concern, it was decided not to leave the materials with participants for the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation. However the problem <strong>of</strong> the ‘recency effect’ phenomenon<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed along with the fact that rehearsal and consolidation <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g was a<br />

necessary requirement for the learn<strong>in</strong>g process (see section 2.8.5.3). It was<br />

decided that follow<strong>in</strong>g a short break at the end <strong>of</strong> session four, a brief revision <strong>of</strong><br />

all 20 creatures learned would be given to all participants. This would <strong>in</strong>volve<br />

participants look<strong>in</strong>g at the stimuli and listen<strong>in</strong>g to all 20 creatures details (on prerecorded<br />

audio tape). It was felt that consolidation and rehearsal <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

occurred dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dependent learn<strong>in</strong>g period <strong>of</strong> the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sessions and so<br />

extra time with the stimuli was not considered necessary for learn<strong>in</strong>g to occur.<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!