Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
providing some information about the smelting environment. The flattish stones are likely to<br />
form part of the furnace architecture. The smaller stones may also define the lower<br />
subterranean limits of the furnace.<br />
Smithing Hearth Bottoms<br />
The recovery of smithing hearth bottoms/fragments and hammerscale indicates that the<br />
activity was taking place on site. Of the 29 fragments recovered, nearly half of them derive<br />
from context [319]. Notable concentrations of SHB’s also occur in context [204=251=302],<br />
[6057] and [6096]. Despite having the most fragments, context [319] is exceeded by context<br />
[6057] in weight, due to the fact the SHB’s are large and mostly complete. The more<br />
complete fragments indicate that they were roughly 10-11cm in diameter, although there is<br />
some variation in size. They all show a degree of curvature and roughness to the under<br />
surface, the bottom, generally with a flattish or slightly concave upper surface. Some<br />
examples of smithing hearth bottoms can be seen in Figure 8. Some of the smithing hearth<br />
bottoms have a relatively smooth upper surface, which may owe its presence to high smithing<br />
temperatures allowing for some liquation of the slag. This would also explain the abundance<br />
of flowed slag, which display the flowed characteristics induced by high smithing<br />
temperatures (however, not all flowed slag necessarily relates to smithing). The smithing<br />
hearth bottoms do vary in appearance slightly. Those from context [6057] have a reddish<br />
luster with a rust type residue, probably incorporation of smithing residues rich in iron. Alone,<br />
the smithing hearth bottoms are not indicative of primary or secondary smithing, as this<br />
interpretation relies heavily on the presence/absence of smelting residues and spheroidal<br />
hammerscale.<br />
Hammerscale<br />
Magnetic residues were collected from almost every context examined. Whilst these residues<br />
are informative of smithing, not all magnetic residues are necessarily hammerscale. The<br />
difficulty in separating hammerscale from other magnetic material is difficult. In contect with<br />
the other archaeometallurgical residues, the magnetic residues collected here are probably<br />
hammerscale, which can be microscopic. The contexts most abundant in magnetic material<br />
are [204=251=302], [319] and [6057], which corresponds well with the recovery of smithing<br />
hearth bottoms/fragments. Over 230 slag spheres were recovered from the sampling bags.<br />
Almost all of these derive from context [6057]. Although this sample does not reflect the real<br />
extent and number from the site, their presence is informative of the type of smithing that was<br />
taking place. Whilst secondary smithing (repair, rework, manufacture) is a common activity,<br />
bloom refining (primary smithing) is not. The evidence for iron production yielded from the<br />
slag assemblage, in conjunction with the spheroidal hammerscale recovered from the<br />
sampling bags, demonstrates that primary smithing took place.<br />
Undiagnostic slag<br />
The majority of the slag assemblage examined was either too small to identify, and/or the<br />
fragments exhibited no diagnostic features. However, when taking into account the diagnostic<br />
residues examined, the nature of the diagnostic slag may imply a particular process. Contexts<br />
[204], [319] and [324] are all strongly indicative of iron production due to their quantities of<br />
smelting slag and tap slag. These contexts also show an abundance of flowed slag. The<br />
undiagnostic slag are larger than the undiagnostic residues of other contexts, which may<br />
indicate that these undiagnostic and flowed slag lumps are fragmentary iron production slags.<br />
108