You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
occupation deposit.<br />
The floor layer in this sample was the thickest of the four taken in this structure,<br />
this being expected as the sample was extracted from a central area of the floor in an area<br />
recorded as having a thicker floor deposit. This layer contained various charcoal<br />
inclusions, many of which had an internal structure visible allowing for the identification<br />
of charred wood (Betula), plant tissues (unidentifiable) and seaweed.<br />
The layer of turf collapse in this sample, like all of the turf layers in this building,<br />
had been affected by post-depositional freeze-thaw processes, resulting in it having a<br />
lenticular structure. It was very mixed and had a notably large bioturbated lens protruding<br />
into the left side.<br />
Sample 39 (Figures 5.7 and 5.8)<br />
In this sample the underlying podzol still has its H and A horizons intact, indicated by a<br />
thin lens of decomposed amorphous organic matter upper part of this layer. This was rich<br />
in grass phytoliths, and was situated in a horizontal orientation, again being evidence of<br />
the ‘crushed’ and buried H horizon, and indicating that the building had not been deturfed.<br />
The boundary between the underlying podzol layer occupation deposit was rather<br />
blurred and unclear in this sample. This is due to the abundant bioturbation that has<br />
blurred the boundaries. This earthworm activity has also transported charcoal into the<br />
natural soil (making up just over 7% of the total layer; see Figure 5.7).<br />
The dark occupation deposit in this sample is less well preserved and includes<br />
earthworm channels and large vughs. However, this layer contained two inclusions of<br />
particular importance to the interpretation of the structure, these being iron hammerscale<br />
(Figure 5.23) and iron slag (Figure 5.24) – direct evidence of the metal working activities<br />
that occurred in this structure.<br />
Structure 4<br />
The primary floors of structure 4 were excavated and sampled in 2007. As mentioned<br />
above, the floors were limited to the eastern half of the structure, where they had<br />
accumulated over flat paving stones, with different floor units identified between different<br />
phases of paving. Samples <strong>VSF</strong>07-38 and -39 were taken from the clearest and thickest<br />
floor layer, unit [7027], which had covered the entire eastern half of the building (Figure<br />
3a). The samples were pressed down over the exposed floor, and bottomed on a flat paving<br />
stone (Figure 3b).<br />
Sample 38 (Figures 5.9 and 5.10)<br />
Unfortunately the high level of bioturbation in this sample makes it impossible to<br />
determine the original microstructure of the sediment (Figure 5.25). However the sample<br />
was split into two layers on the basis that the lower half was slightly less bioturbated and<br />
contained a higher content of amorphous organic matter.<br />
This lower layer contained c.10% amorphous organic matter, most of which had a<br />
dominant horizontal orientation. This horizontal orientation is possibly the result of organic<br />
material accumulating and being trampled into the floor. The presence of fungal sclerotia<br />
are associated with this high content of decomposed organic matter. This organic matter<br />
could either be related to material stored within the building (if it was a storage building),<br />
or to flooring materials.<br />
179