29.01.2015 Views

VSF 2010 Report - Nabo

VSF 2010 Report - Nabo

VSF 2010 Report - Nabo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Descriptions of Sections<br />

Trench 42<br />

The southern part of the boundary wall was clearly resting directly on a podzol with a thin<br />

A horizon and an eluviated E horizon (grey coloured), similar to the soils directly<br />

underlying the Viking Age buildings, which had also been used to construct their turf<br />

walls. As can clearly be seen in Figure 2, this podzol was truncated to the north and south<br />

of the wall, and had been used to construct the earliest phase of the wall (light coloured<br />

layer 7, Figure 2b). Only two courses of this eariest wall were preserved, and there was<br />

second phase of wall construction overlying it, which was made from a more reddish<br />

coloured turf. Although not visible in the section, in the sourthern part of the trench, resting<br />

on this reddish turf, there was a large stone that must have been deliberately placed there in<br />

order to help shore up the southern edge of the wall and keep it from collapsing down the<br />

slope to the south. This reddish turf was only preserved to a maximum thickness of 15 cm,<br />

and was overlain by a third phase of wall construction, this one consisting of a dark brown<br />

andisol that was indistinguishable from the surrounding soils (see Figure 2a). Since the<br />

Hekla-1693 tephra was not visible in this turf, it seems likely that this third phase is<br />

relatively recent in date – perhaps 18th or 19th century – but of course this remains<br />

impossible to prove. Finally, a fence post had been placed on the northern edge of the wall,<br />

and a piece of barbed wire (introduced to Iceland in 1903-4; Broddi 1904) was found in the<br />

topsoil, indicating that this boundary had been in use until at least the early 20th century,<br />

even though the fence line is now considerably further south.<br />

Trench 43<br />

Unlike the southern part of the boundary wall, the western part of the wall buried a very<br />

stoney/gravelly brown soil with no clear evidence for an eluviated horizon; it was wetter in<br />

this immediate area and was apparently not well enough drained for a podzol to develop.<br />

Two different phases of wall construction were clearly in evidence, the earlier of which<br />

was constructed of turves taken from this brown soil, but also contained one turf that was<br />

taken from a podzol (see Figure 3a and the light coloured layer 5 in Figure 3b). At least<br />

three courses of this turf phase were preserved in the section. Overlying it was another<br />

phase of turf construction preserved to at least three courses, which was made up of a<br />

strong brown and dark brown coloured turf, which had been stacked mainly on the eastern<br />

(inner edge) of the older turf. Finally, a post hole was dug directly into the top of the turf<br />

wall, probably in the early 20th century, when farmers were encouraged to use barbed wire<br />

fencing to enclose their homefields (Broddi 1904). This fence post was subsequently<br />

removed, and the current fence line was placed a few meters to the east of the turf<br />

boundary wall.<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!