You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Descriptions of Sections<br />
Trench 42<br />
The southern part of the boundary wall was clearly resting directly on a podzol with a thin<br />
A horizon and an eluviated E horizon (grey coloured), similar to the soils directly<br />
underlying the Viking Age buildings, which had also been used to construct their turf<br />
walls. As can clearly be seen in Figure 2, this podzol was truncated to the north and south<br />
of the wall, and had been used to construct the earliest phase of the wall (light coloured<br />
layer 7, Figure 2b). Only two courses of this eariest wall were preserved, and there was<br />
second phase of wall construction overlying it, which was made from a more reddish<br />
coloured turf. Although not visible in the section, in the sourthern part of the trench, resting<br />
on this reddish turf, there was a large stone that must have been deliberately placed there in<br />
order to help shore up the southern edge of the wall and keep it from collapsing down the<br />
slope to the south. This reddish turf was only preserved to a maximum thickness of 15 cm,<br />
and was overlain by a third phase of wall construction, this one consisting of a dark brown<br />
andisol that was indistinguishable from the surrounding soils (see Figure 2a). Since the<br />
Hekla-1693 tephra was not visible in this turf, it seems likely that this third phase is<br />
relatively recent in date – perhaps 18th or 19th century – but of course this remains<br />
impossible to prove. Finally, a fence post had been placed on the northern edge of the wall,<br />
and a piece of barbed wire (introduced to Iceland in 1903-4; Broddi 1904) was found in the<br />
topsoil, indicating that this boundary had been in use until at least the early 20th century,<br />
even though the fence line is now considerably further south.<br />
Trench 43<br />
Unlike the southern part of the boundary wall, the western part of the wall buried a very<br />
stoney/gravelly brown soil with no clear evidence for an eluviated horizon; it was wetter in<br />
this immediate area and was apparently not well enough drained for a podzol to develop.<br />
Two different phases of wall construction were clearly in evidence, the earlier of which<br />
was constructed of turves taken from this brown soil, but also contained one turf that was<br />
taken from a podzol (see Figure 3a and the light coloured layer 5 in Figure 3b). At least<br />
three courses of this turf phase were preserved in the section. Overlying it was another<br />
phase of turf construction preserved to at least three courses, which was made up of a<br />
strong brown and dark brown coloured turf, which had been stacked mainly on the eastern<br />
(inner edge) of the older turf. Finally, a post hole was dug directly into the top of the turf<br />
wall, probably in the early 20th century, when farmers were encouraged to use barbed wire<br />
fencing to enclose their homefields (Broddi 1904). This fence post was subsequently<br />
removed, and the current fence line was placed a few meters to the east of the turf<br />
boundary wall.<br />
65