29.01.2015 Views

VSF 2010 Report - Nabo

VSF 2010 Report - Nabo

VSF 2010 Report - Nabo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.00<br />

5.00<br />

% Charcoal<br />

4.00<br />

3.00<br />

2.00<br />

1.00<br />

0.00<br />

543<br />

541<br />

539<br />

537<br />

535<br />

533<br />

531<br />

529<br />

527<br />

525<br />

523<br />

521<br />

519<br />

517<br />

515<br />

513<br />

511<br />

509<br />

507<br />

505<br />

Sample Number<br />

Figure 2. Graph showing charcoal volume as a percentage of total original sample volume<br />

As is shown in Figure 2, there is substantial variation in the amount of charcoal in the<br />

samples, from more than 5% charcoal in the richest contexts to no charcoal at all in some<br />

layers. There are three contexts which clearly show high charcoal content: [10407], [10409],<br />

and [10411]. Contexts [10409] and [10411] were both described as burnt layers with visibly<br />

high charcoal content during excavation, while [10407] was described as a turf collapse layer<br />

with frequent charcoal flecks (see context descriptions, below). While it is obvious that there<br />

will be more charcoal in apparently ‘burnt’ layers, there is also a trend towards greater<br />

amounts of charcoal in the upper layers of the column, while no charcoal fragments over<br />

1mm were recovered from any layers below [10414], apart from in the bottommost two<br />

contexts.<br />

160

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!