Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Microscopy<br />
The results from the optical microscopy and the SEM-EDS analysis for each sample are<br />
presented in Table 5. The results from the chemical analyses have been normalised, with the<br />
averages given (n= number of analyses), to assist comparability between analyses. All<br />
elements measured and quantified are expressed in oxides (stoichiometrically) in weight<br />
percent (wt%) as normalised values, along with the average value for the raw analytical totals.<br />
All phases identified through optical microscopy were confirmed through chemical analysis.<br />
Tap slag<br />
Figure 10 shows a BSE image of the tap slag analysed. The microstructure consisted of a<br />
largely even distribution of angular and skeletal magnetite in a very fine matrix of fayalite and<br />
glass. The magnetite is quite densely dispersed throughout the sample, except towards the<br />
upper cooling surface which is characterised by large vesicles and a glassy matrix with a<br />
decreased concentration of iron oxides. The high degree of homogeneity within the<br />
microstructure of the sample indicates that the tap slag formed at the same temperature. The<br />
oxidising conditions of the slag formation may be inferred by the high concentration of<br />
densely packed magnetite.<br />
Smelting slag<br />
Two fragments of smelting slag were analysed. The slag contained multiple phases. Wūstite<br />
and fayalite were identified in different crystalline forms along with a glassy phase. A single<br />
iron prill can be seen in Figure 11, surrounded by fine branching wūstite dendrites embedded<br />
in a matrix of acicular fayalite and glass. Many iron prills were discovered in the slag matrix,<br />
demonstrating that the slag was formed from ferrous metallurgy. Different areas within the<br />
slag were characterised by changes in the microstructure, as well as distinctive boundaries and<br />
cracks between the different zones of interest. Transgranular cracks were common throughout<br />
the slag (Figures 13 and 14), which often separated different zones of interest. The zones<br />
differ in their microstructure. This feature was also observed in areas where transgranular<br />
cracks had not formed. The boundary between these different zones is very distinctive,<br />
separating one area densely packed with wüstite in a matrix of large grains of fayalite, from<br />
another area characterised by a much finer grain structure of acicular fayalite and fewer<br />
dendrites of wüstite (Figure 12). The heterogeneity of the crystalline forms reflects changes in<br />
the temperature conditions in which the slag was produced. The contrast between the high<br />
concentration and low concentration regions of wüstite reflect the variability in oxidation.<br />
Smithing hearth bottom<br />
One fragment of smithing hearth bottom slag was analysed. This slag exhibited a<br />
microstructure consisting of iron oxide grains in a matrix of fayalite and glass.<br />
Undiagnostic slag<br />
Two fragments of undiagnostic slag were analysed. Figure 15 shows the microstructure of one<br />
fragment consisting of globular wūstite with few dendritic structures embedded in a matrix of<br />
polycrystalline fayalite and glass. What is interesting is the second fragment of undiagnostic<br />
slag, which revealed semi-fused structure showing mineralic inclusions (Figure 16 and 17).<br />
Although a representative proportion of the mineralic inclusions have been chemically<br />
111