Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding
Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding
Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Introduction<br />
Don L. Keim<br />
BREEDING COTTON 549<br />
Industry highlights<br />
Cotton breeding<br />
Delta <strong>and</strong> Pine L<strong>and</strong> Company, One Cotton Row, PO Box 157, Scott, MS 38772, USA<br />
Modern upl<strong>and</strong> cotton, Gossypium hirsutum, is an allotetraploid which, though primarily self-pollinated, is readily cross-pollinated<br />
by insects. Cotton varieties are developed primarily by pure-line breeding techniques. But many varieties have traditionally been<br />
mixtures <strong>of</strong> closely related genotypes as a result <strong>of</strong> cross-pollination, cotton morphology, <strong>and</strong> breeding procedures. Uniquely, the<br />
primary economic value is not the seed itself, but in the fiber produced as an extension <strong>of</strong> the seed coat cells.<br />
Some terminology unique to cotton is explained below:<br />
1 Lint: the economic fiber that is separated from the seed during ginning. After ginning <strong>and</strong> cleaning, the lint is compacted<br />
into a bale. In the USA, each bale is identified <strong>and</strong> sampled for quality determination <strong>and</strong> marketed in bale units <strong>of</strong> approximately<br />
480 pounds net weight <strong>of</strong> lint.<br />
2 Cotton boll: a single fruiting body that contains at harvest the seed <strong>and</strong> attached lint fibers, <strong>and</strong> the dried ovary wall (burs).<br />
3 Lint percent: the proportion <strong>of</strong> the lint to the harvested seed cotton (seed with lint attached).<br />
4 Fiber quality: the characteristics that affect the processing <strong>of</strong> lint into yarn <strong>and</strong> finished textile goods. Four primary characteristics<br />
that affect the marketability <strong>and</strong> pricing <strong>of</strong> fiber are grade, length, micronaire, <strong>and</strong> strength. Many other characteristics<br />
affect the usability <strong>of</strong> fiber, some <strong>of</strong> which are uniformity, elongation, <strong>and</strong> short fiber content. Many fiber characteristics<br />
have a genetic component, but a major portion <strong>of</strong> the variation is due to environmental, harvest, <strong>and</strong> ginning effects. Fiber<br />
characteristics are determined in the commercial channels, <strong>and</strong> in most breeding programs, through the use <strong>of</strong> an HVI (high<br />
volume instrumentation) machine.<br />
5 Grade: the combination <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> leaf trash <strong>and</strong> color <strong>of</strong> a lint sample.<br />
6 Length <strong>of</strong> staple: the length <strong>of</strong> the fibers in a sample (2.5% span length).<br />
7 Micronaire: the combination <strong>of</strong> relative fineness <strong>and</strong> fiber maturity <strong>of</strong> a sample.<br />
8 Strength: the amount <strong>of</strong> force required to break a specified bundle <strong>of</strong> fibers.<br />
Historically, a major factor contributing to the high cost <strong>of</strong> cotton production has been in the area <strong>of</strong> insect management. The<br />
insects most affecting US production have been the bollworm/budworm complex, Heliothis virescens <strong>and</strong> Helicoverpa zea, <strong>and</strong><br />
the boll weevil, Anthomonas gr<strong>and</strong>is. Recent adoption <strong>of</strong> new practices has dramatically reduced control costs associated with<br />
these two pests. The government-sponsored boll weevil eradication program has practically eliminated boll weevil as a pest in<br />
major areas <strong>of</strong> the US Cotton Belt. Additionally, in 1996, farmers began adopting the use <strong>of</strong> transgenic cotton which contains a<br />
gene that confers resistance to the bollworm/budworm complex. This gene was developed by Monsanto <strong>and</strong> was given the tradename<br />
Bollgard® in cotton.<br />
Cotton breeding as compared to breeding in other field crops is affected by two key factors. First, the fiber must be removed<br />
from the seed (ginning). Second, the remaining short fibers (seed fuzz) must also be removed with acid (delinting) so that the seed<br />
is “flowable” <strong>and</strong> can be planted with modern equipment. These processes, ginning <strong>and</strong> delinting, are costly in resources (time,<br />
effort, money). Additionally, cotton breeding is expensive due to much h<strong>and</strong> harvesting (h<strong>and</strong> picking), the limited number <strong>of</strong><br />
seed per boll, <strong>and</strong> the need for h<strong>and</strong> selfing.<br />
These factors, along with the need for expensive fiber quality evaluations, make the resource cost per unit <strong>of</strong> genetic gain much<br />
higher with cotton when compared to several other crops (Figure 1). Given fixed resources, the genetic gain will generally be less<br />
with cotton.<br />
Until recently, cotton could have been considered to be relatively unbred when compared to the “state <strong>of</strong> the art” in crops like<br />
corn, soybean, <strong>and</strong> wheat. In the past, resource limits had forced cotton breeders to have fewer populations with small population<br />
sizes <strong>and</strong> to advance limited numbers <strong>of</strong> relatively unselected strains.<br />
The recent widespread adoption <strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> transgenic varieties has greatly increased the value <strong>of</strong> seed. Seed companies reaping<br />
this value have been able to place more resources in the h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> breeders. The recent gains in lint yield <strong>and</strong> fiber quality have<br />
been a direct result <strong>of</strong> these increased resources <strong>and</strong> the efficiencies gained from modernization <strong>of</strong> breeding procedures.<br />
<strong>Breeding</strong> program<br />
A major effort in this breeding program has been to maximize the gain enabled by the added resources made available. Several<br />
technique <strong>and</strong> procedural changes have been adopted to increase the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the utilized resources. This has resulted in an<br />
increased number <strong>of</strong> populations, larger population sizes, heavy selection pressure, <strong>and</strong> the early identification <strong>of</strong> superior strains.