Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding
Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding
Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
224 CHAPTER 13<br />
Microcloning <strong>of</strong> tall wheatgrass for breeding<br />
Within 6 weeks <strong>of</strong> culturing sterile, hulled seeds <strong>of</strong> tall wheatgrass on MS or GD media to which kinetin or BA <strong>and</strong> 2,4-D, NAA, or<br />
IAA were added, adventitious shoot development could be observed from the callus (Figure 1c), irrespective <strong>of</strong> whether the callus<br />
originated from germinated or non-germinated seeds. Generally, shoot development was preceded by callus greening, which<br />
was a sign <strong>of</strong> meristem development. Such a physical manifestation has precedents in the first report on micropropagation <strong>of</strong> tall<br />
wheatgrass (Kindiger 2002) <strong>and</strong> reports on other crops such as cassava (Mat<strong>and</strong> et al. 2004) <strong>and</strong> peanut (Mat<strong>and</strong> et al. 1994). It<br />
has been previously reported that such plants, or other indirectly formed shoots, could result from a mono- or multicellular<br />
organogenetic process (George 1993). In this report, light microscopy observations suggested that most, if not all, tall wheatgrass<br />
shoots that were observed resulted from an aggregation <strong>of</strong> several adjacent callus cells. Single <strong>and</strong> multiple adventitious shoots<br />
were observed on both MS <strong>and</strong> GD semisolid media (Figure 1c).<br />
As in the case <strong>of</strong> callus formation, treatments containing 2,4-D in combination with either kinetin or BA induced a significantly<br />
greater amount <strong>of</strong> shoots (9.2 or 8.3 shoots per callus on MS; <strong>and</strong> 8.2 or 6.2 shoots per callus on GD) <strong>and</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> shoot formation<br />
(90% or 84% on MS; <strong>and</strong> 82% or 78% on GD) than those induced with either IAA or NAA combined with similar levels <strong>of</strong><br />
cytokinin (Table 1). Overall, kinetin outperformed BA for morphogenetic responses; however, morphogenetic responses<br />
observed on the MS basal medium were generally comparable to those observed on the GD basal medium.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the main contributions <strong>of</strong> this report is that it delineates, for the first time, a one-step method <strong>of</strong> microcloning for the<br />
improvement <strong>of</strong> tall wheatgrass. In the first report on tissue culture <strong>of</strong> tall wheatgrass, Kindiger (2002) depicted a three-treatment<br />
microcloning approach corresponding to the three phases <strong>of</strong> callus, shoot, <strong>and</strong> root induction, which is a common practice in tissue<br />
culture <strong>of</strong> other crop species such as cassava as described by Mat<strong>and</strong> et al. (2004). Callus was induced from seeds in the dark,<br />
on MS medium containing basal salts, 3% sucrose, 0.5 g/l casein, 8 g/l phytagel, <strong>and</strong> 0.005 g/l 2,4-D <strong>and</strong> benzylaminopurine<br />
(BAP). Then, callus was transferred to the shoot-inducing medium containing an increased concentration <strong>of</strong> sugar (5%), a<br />
reduced concentration <strong>of</strong> phytagel (5 g/l), a growth regulator combination treatment with a lower concentration <strong>of</strong> BAP (0.001<br />
g/l) <strong>and</strong> a similar concentration <strong>of</strong> NAA (0.005 g/l) without 2,4-D <strong>and</strong> casein. Lastly, shoots were rooted on half-strength MS<br />
medium containing decreased concentrations <strong>of</strong> sucrose (1.5%) <strong>and</strong> 2,4-D (0.75 mg/l), an addition <strong>of</strong> IAA (3.75 mg/l) <strong>and</strong> kinetin<br />
(1.075 mg/l), <strong>and</strong> an increased concentration <strong>of</strong> phytagel (10 g/l) without casein. The present report expounds on a related but<br />
one-step microcloning approach in which all the three morphogenetic phases including callus, shoot, <strong>and</strong> root formation were<br />
controlled under a single treatment. Not only could it reduce a long culturing period, but it could also eliminate the cost <strong>of</strong><br />
increased concentrations <strong>of</strong>, <strong>and</strong>/or additional, chemicals.<br />
However, when producing in vitro plants through indirect adventitious shoot formation, it should be borne in mind that there is<br />
a potential for indefinite rejuvenation <strong>of</strong> shooting callus. Maintaining such a property requires that the callus be subcultured in<br />
relatively mid-sized amounts. Frequent break-<strong>of</strong>fs <strong>of</strong> callus may enhance the wounding effect that normally stimulates callus<br />
formation in plant tissues in nature. This induces plant wound healing that is underlain by intense cell division. After the callus<br />
has formed shoots, it is necessary to frequently break them <strong>of</strong>f about every 2–3 weeks to stimulate rapid shoot growth. Further, it<br />
was observed that a cluster <strong>of</strong> young shoots would grow uniformly, with new shoot formation at their base, as long as none <strong>of</strong> the<br />
shootlets significantly outgrew the others. Based upon our laboratory experience, it was surmised that any more rapidly growing<br />
shoot might exert an inhibitory effect on its immediate surrounding shootlets, similar to the apical dominance. This was further<br />
corroborated by the finding that the removal <strong>of</strong> the tallest shootlet <strong>of</strong> the cluster resulted in a rapid elongation <strong>of</strong> all the surrounding<br />
shootlets <strong>and</strong> an initiation <strong>of</strong> new shoot development on the same callus.<br />
Shoot rooting<br />
Generally, in vitro-induced shoots <strong>of</strong> appropriate height, according to the desires <strong>of</strong> the researcher, may be rooted in a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
ways: (i) shoots may be transferred to fresh basal media; (ii) shoots may be transferred to fresh media with different growth regulator<br />
treatments, primarily auxin alone, or with a trace amount <strong>of</strong> cytokinin; <strong>and</strong> (iii) shoots may be repeatedly transferred onto fresh<br />
shoot-inducing media. When root-inducing treatment media are different from shoot-inducing treatment media, it is recommended<br />
that the concentrations <strong>of</strong> growth regulators be judiciously decreased. As is the experience <strong>of</strong> other scientists working<br />
under other experimental conditions, it is strongly recommended that root-inducing media be devoid <strong>of</strong> cytokinins but have a low<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> a single auxin. However, because each species may respond differently to similar treatments, it is recommended<br />
that researchers apply their own best judgment based upon their knowledge <strong>of</strong> the crop.<br />
In vitro adventitious shoots that were formed in tall wheatgrass were initially rooted in media devoid <strong>of</strong> growth regulators.<br />
However, it was further observed that shoot-inducing media could also easily induce roots by extending the incubation <strong>of</strong> shoots<br />
eligible for rooting on shoot-inducing media by 1 or 2 weeks. Following the st<strong>and</strong>ard practice, in vitro-induced shoots are systematically<br />
acclimatized to the environmental conditions prior to their transfer into the greenhouse. During the course <strong>of</strong> our<br />
investigation with tall wheatgrass, it was observed that an in vitro rooting system could eventually supply nutrients to support<br />
plants in the greenhouse, when the acclimatization step was omitted. Thus, all in vitro-formed rooted plants were thereafter successfully<br />
transferred into the greenhouse directly from their test tubes without incurring any loss. Similar observations were also<br />
recently made on cassava (Mat<strong>and</strong> et al. 2004). <strong>Plant</strong>s regenerated in vitro developed normally in the greenhouse as well as in the<br />
field (Figure 2).