09.12.2012 Views

Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding

Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding

Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

252 CHAPTER 14<br />

selection in a breeding program hinges on the availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> useful molecular markers. Fortunately, this resource<br />

is becoming increasingly available to many species,<br />

thanks to the advances in biotechnology. This breeding<br />

approach is applicable to improving both simple <strong>and</strong><br />

complex traits, as a means <strong>of</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> a trait that<br />

is difficult or expensive to evaluate by conventional<br />

methods. The basic requirement is to identify a marker<br />

that co-segregates with a major gene <strong>of</strong> the target trait.<br />

MAS is more beneficial to breeding quantitative traits<br />

with low heritability.<br />

The key steps in the implementation <strong>of</strong> MAS in<br />

breeding QTLs are summarized by D. W. Podlich <strong>and</strong><br />

his colleagues as follows:<br />

1 Creation <strong>of</strong> a dense genetic map <strong>of</strong> molecular markers.<br />

2 Detection <strong>of</strong> QTLs based on statistical association<br />

between markers <strong>and</strong> phenotypic variability.<br />

3 Definition <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> desirable marker alleles based on<br />

the results <strong>of</strong> the QTL analysis.<br />

4 The use <strong>and</strong>/or extrapolation <strong>of</strong> this information<br />

to the current set <strong>of</strong> breeding germplasm to enable<br />

marker-based selection decisions to be made.<br />

However, as these researchers noted, MAS for more<br />

complex traits is still challenging, partly because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

difficulty <strong>of</strong> effective detection, estimation, <strong>and</strong> utility <strong>of</strong><br />

QTLs <strong>and</strong> their effects. The problem is more significant<br />

with more complex traits (such as grain yield) that are<br />

controlled by many genes under the influence <strong>of</strong> epistasis<br />

(gene-by-gene interaction) <strong>and</strong> gene-by-environment<br />

(G × E) interaction effects. On the contrary, most<br />

researchers engaged in evaluations <strong>of</strong> mapping <strong>and</strong> MAS<br />

tend to assume that QTLs act independently (i.e., no<br />

interaction with other genes <strong>and</strong>/or environment).<br />

To overcome this problem, Podlich <strong>and</strong> colleagues<br />

proposed a new approach to MAS from the conventional<br />

one, which assumes that desirable QTL alleles,<br />

once identified, will remain relevant throughout many<br />

cycles <strong>of</strong> selection during plant breeding. In the conventional<br />

procedure, researchers tend to estimate QTL<br />

effects at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the project <strong>and</strong> continue to<br />

apply the estimates to new germplasm created during<br />

the breeding process (i.e., mapping start only). The<br />

assumption <strong>of</strong> fixed QTL values is appropriate if the<br />

traits are controlled by additive genes. This will allow<br />

MAS to be conducted by independently assembling<br />

or stacking desirable alleles. This assumption is not<br />

applicable to situations in which context dependencies<br />

(changes in genetic background) occur. On such occasions,<br />

the value <strong>of</strong> QTL alleles can change depending on<br />

the genetic structure <strong>of</strong> the current set <strong>of</strong> germplasm in<br />

the breeding program. In other words, QTL values will<br />

change over the cycles <strong>of</strong> selection, as the background<br />

effects change. These progressive changes in genetic<br />

structure may make the initial combinations <strong>of</strong> alleles no<br />

longer the best target or no longer significant in increasing<br />

the trait performance in future breeding cycles.<br />

Podlich <strong>and</strong> colleagues proposed the “mapping as<br />

you go” approach to MAS <strong>of</strong> complex traits. QTL<br />

effects are cyclically re-estimated each time a new set <strong>of</strong><br />

germplasm is created. This ensures that the basis <strong>of</strong> MAS<br />

remains relevant to the current set <strong>of</strong> germplasm.<br />

S. D. Tanksley <strong>and</strong> T. C. Nelson developed a procedure,<br />

advanced backcross breeding, for the simultaneous<br />

discovery <strong>and</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong> desirable QTLs from<br />

unadapted germplasm into elite lines. Basically, this procedure<br />

postpones QTL mapping until the BC 2 or BC 3 ,<br />

applying negative selection during these generations to<br />

reduce the occurrence <strong>of</strong> undesirable alleles from the<br />

donor (unadapted genotype). The advantage <strong>of</strong> this<br />

strategy is that BC 2 /BC 3 provides adequate statistical<br />

power for QTL identification, while at the same time<br />

being sufficiently similar to the recurrent parent to allow<br />

selection for QTL-NIL (near-isogenic line) in a short<br />

time (1–2 years). The QTL discovered can be verified<br />

<strong>and</strong> the NILs used directly as improved cultivars or as<br />

parents for hybrid breeding.<br />

Important applications <strong>of</strong> molecular<br />

markers in plant breeding<br />

Molecular markers may be used by breeders to increase<br />

the rate <strong>of</strong> genetic gain, verification or identification<br />

<strong>of</strong> parentage, characterization <strong>of</strong> germplasm, <strong>and</strong><br />

quantification <strong>of</strong> genetic variability.<br />

1 Screening single traits. Molecular markers associated<br />

with many agronomic traits <strong>of</strong> importance (e.g.,<br />

nematode resistance in sugar beet, blast resistance in<br />

rice) have been discovered <strong>and</strong> used for screening for<br />

these traits in breeding. MAS is useful for simple<br />

traits, or those for which genetic gain per unit time<br />

(rate <strong>of</strong> genetic gain) is <strong>of</strong> high economic return.<br />

2 Speeding up breeding programs. Markers add<br />

speed <strong>and</strong> precision to backcross breeding programs.<br />

They help to identify the gene <strong>of</strong> interest to be transferred<br />

<strong>and</strong> facilitate the elimination <strong>of</strong> the undesirable<br />

genome in the donor parent (reduces linkage drag).<br />

A fewer number <strong>of</strong> backcrosses are needed to recover<br />

the genotype <strong>of</strong> the adapted parent.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!