Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding
Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding
Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
252 CHAPTER 14<br />
selection in a breeding program hinges on the availability<br />
<strong>of</strong> useful molecular markers. Fortunately, this resource<br />
is becoming increasingly available to many species,<br />
thanks to the advances in biotechnology. This breeding<br />
approach is applicable to improving both simple <strong>and</strong><br />
complex traits, as a means <strong>of</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> a trait that<br />
is difficult or expensive to evaluate by conventional<br />
methods. The basic requirement is to identify a marker<br />
that co-segregates with a major gene <strong>of</strong> the target trait.<br />
MAS is more beneficial to breeding quantitative traits<br />
with low heritability.<br />
The key steps in the implementation <strong>of</strong> MAS in<br />
breeding QTLs are summarized by D. W. Podlich <strong>and</strong><br />
his colleagues as follows:<br />
1 Creation <strong>of</strong> a dense genetic map <strong>of</strong> molecular markers.<br />
2 Detection <strong>of</strong> QTLs based on statistical association<br />
between markers <strong>and</strong> phenotypic variability.<br />
3 Definition <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> desirable marker alleles based on<br />
the results <strong>of</strong> the QTL analysis.<br />
4 The use <strong>and</strong>/or extrapolation <strong>of</strong> this information<br />
to the current set <strong>of</strong> breeding germplasm to enable<br />
marker-based selection decisions to be made.<br />
However, as these researchers noted, MAS for more<br />
complex traits is still challenging, partly because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
difficulty <strong>of</strong> effective detection, estimation, <strong>and</strong> utility <strong>of</strong><br />
QTLs <strong>and</strong> their effects. The problem is more significant<br />
with more complex traits (such as grain yield) that are<br />
controlled by many genes under the influence <strong>of</strong> epistasis<br />
(gene-by-gene interaction) <strong>and</strong> gene-by-environment<br />
(G × E) interaction effects. On the contrary, most<br />
researchers engaged in evaluations <strong>of</strong> mapping <strong>and</strong> MAS<br />
tend to assume that QTLs act independently (i.e., no<br />
interaction with other genes <strong>and</strong>/or environment).<br />
To overcome this problem, Podlich <strong>and</strong> colleagues<br />
proposed a new approach to MAS from the conventional<br />
one, which assumes that desirable QTL alleles,<br />
once identified, will remain relevant throughout many<br />
cycles <strong>of</strong> selection during plant breeding. In the conventional<br />
procedure, researchers tend to estimate QTL<br />
effects at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the project <strong>and</strong> continue to<br />
apply the estimates to new germplasm created during<br />
the breeding process (i.e., mapping start only). The<br />
assumption <strong>of</strong> fixed QTL values is appropriate if the<br />
traits are controlled by additive genes. This will allow<br />
MAS to be conducted by independently assembling<br />
or stacking desirable alleles. This assumption is not<br />
applicable to situations in which context dependencies<br />
(changes in genetic background) occur. On such occasions,<br />
the value <strong>of</strong> QTL alleles can change depending on<br />
the genetic structure <strong>of</strong> the current set <strong>of</strong> germplasm in<br />
the breeding program. In other words, QTL values will<br />
change over the cycles <strong>of</strong> selection, as the background<br />
effects change. These progressive changes in genetic<br />
structure may make the initial combinations <strong>of</strong> alleles no<br />
longer the best target or no longer significant in increasing<br />
the trait performance in future breeding cycles.<br />
Podlich <strong>and</strong> colleagues proposed the “mapping as<br />
you go” approach to MAS <strong>of</strong> complex traits. QTL<br />
effects are cyclically re-estimated each time a new set <strong>of</strong><br />
germplasm is created. This ensures that the basis <strong>of</strong> MAS<br />
remains relevant to the current set <strong>of</strong> germplasm.<br />
S. D. Tanksley <strong>and</strong> T. C. Nelson developed a procedure,<br />
advanced backcross breeding, for the simultaneous<br />
discovery <strong>and</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong> desirable QTLs from<br />
unadapted germplasm into elite lines. Basically, this procedure<br />
postpones QTL mapping until the BC 2 or BC 3 ,<br />
applying negative selection during these generations to<br />
reduce the occurrence <strong>of</strong> undesirable alleles from the<br />
donor (unadapted genotype). The advantage <strong>of</strong> this<br />
strategy is that BC 2 /BC 3 provides adequate statistical<br />
power for QTL identification, while at the same time<br />
being sufficiently similar to the recurrent parent to allow<br />
selection for QTL-NIL (near-isogenic line) in a short<br />
time (1–2 years). The QTL discovered can be verified<br />
<strong>and</strong> the NILs used directly as improved cultivars or as<br />
parents for hybrid breeding.<br />
Important applications <strong>of</strong> molecular<br />
markers in plant breeding<br />
Molecular markers may be used by breeders to increase<br />
the rate <strong>of</strong> genetic gain, verification or identification<br />
<strong>of</strong> parentage, characterization <strong>of</strong> germplasm, <strong>and</strong><br />
quantification <strong>of</strong> genetic variability.<br />
1 Screening single traits. Molecular markers associated<br />
with many agronomic traits <strong>of</strong> importance (e.g.,<br />
nematode resistance in sugar beet, blast resistance in<br />
rice) have been discovered <strong>and</strong> used for screening for<br />
these traits in breeding. MAS is useful for simple<br />
traits, or those for which genetic gain per unit time<br />
(rate <strong>of</strong> genetic gain) is <strong>of</strong> high economic return.<br />
2 Speeding up breeding programs. Markers add<br />
speed <strong>and</strong> precision to backcross breeding programs.<br />
They help to identify the gene <strong>of</strong> interest to be transferred<br />
<strong>and</strong> facilitate the elimination <strong>of</strong> the undesirable<br />
genome in the donor parent (reduces linkage drag).<br />
A fewer number <strong>of</strong> backcrosses are needed to recover<br />
the genotype <strong>of</strong> the adapted parent.