17.05.2017 Views

Pan-Pacific Conference XXXIV. Designing New Business Models in Developing Economies

This publication represents the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Pan-Pacific Conference being held in Lima, Peru May 29-31, 2017. The Pan-Pacific Conference has served as an important forum for the exchange of ideas and information for promoting understanding and cooperation among the peoples of the world since 1984. Last year, we had a memorable conference in Miri, Malaysia, in cooperation with Curtin University Sarawak, under the theme of “Building a Smart Society through Innovation and Co-creation.” Professor Pauline Ho served as Chair of the Local Organizing Committee, with strong leadership support of Pro Vice-Chancellor Professor Jim Mienczakowski and Dean Jonathan Winterton.

This publication represents the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Pan-Pacific Conference being held in Lima, Peru May 29-31, 2017. The Pan-Pacific Conference has served as an important forum for the exchange of ideas and information for promoting understanding and cooperation among the peoples of the world since 1984. Last year, we had a memorable conference in Miri, Malaysia, in cooperation with Curtin University Sarawak, under the theme of “Building a Smart Society through Innovation and Co-creation.” Professor Pauline Ho served as Chair of the Local Organizing Committee, with strong leadership support of Pro Vice-Chancellor Professor Jim Mienczakowski and Dean Jonathan Winterton.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Anxiety Index is def<strong>in</strong>ed as the ratio of term<br />

frequency (TF) of a concerned risk to co-occurrence<br />

frequency of negative terms (COF N ). The negative<br />

terms are counted based on words and semantic<br />

orientations. This <strong>in</strong>dex considers the cognitive<br />

assessment of a concerned risk, such as ‘radiation’.<br />

Even if the crisis communication corpus were to<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude numerous references to ‘radiation’ and<br />

negative assessment terms were not great, people’s<br />

anxiety levels for ‘radiation’ would be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as<br />

relatively low. On the other hand, even if the crisis<br />

communication corpus were to <strong>in</strong>clude only a few<br />

references to the term, an assessment with a greater<br />

amount of negative terms would <strong>in</strong>dicate that<br />

anxiety levels about ‘radiation’ were relatively high.<br />

Figure 2 shows the co-relationship between anxiety<br />

and time. In this study, COFN with ‘radiation’ were<br />

counted for each seven days. To analyze the corelationship<br />

between anxiety and time, we applied<br />

the Anxiety Index for anxiety variable y and set a<br />

time-serious variable x 1(,..., 7) as a day. Thus,<br />

the co-relationship could be stated formally as a<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ear regression model. In the figure, the regression<br />

coefficient of government (TEPCO) is 2:1493; it is<br />

positive and its coefficient of determ<strong>in</strong>ation (R2) is<br />

over 0.8. That means government (TEPCO) anxiety<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g ‘radiation’ <strong>in</strong>creased as time passed. On<br />

the other hand, Twitter’s regression coefficient was<br />

negative, but its R 2 was low. It means the corelationship<br />

between anxiety levels of Twitter users<br />

and time was not significant.<br />

5. Conclusion<br />

This paper has proposed a methodology for<br />

measur<strong>in</strong>g anxiety <strong>in</strong> a disaster, based on corpus<br />

l<strong>in</strong>guistics and a comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of methods, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

TFIDF and COF. In the Great East Japan<br />

Earthquake, Twitter played an important role <strong>in</strong><br />

crisis communication between disaster areas and<br />

non-disaster areas <strong>in</strong> the early phase of the crisis.<br />

Measurement of anxiety related to the disaster was<br />

achieved by estimat<strong>in</strong>g the risk assessments of<br />

TEPCO and Twitter users by us<strong>in</strong>g the Anxiety<br />

Index, which was proposed <strong>in</strong> this paper as an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicator of negative risk perceptions of people<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g the Great East Japan Earthquake.<br />

Compar<strong>in</strong>g TEPCO’s announcements and the<br />

Twitter corpus, anxiety expressed by the<br />

government changed noticeably, while anxiety<br />

levels of citizens did not show clear fluctuations.<br />

This study can provide governmental agencies with<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es for issu<strong>in</strong>g clear <strong>in</strong>formation about<br />

disasters to reduce anxiety among the public.<br />

Methodology of this study could have been<br />

improved, however. First, the list of semantic<br />

orientations used for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g if words were<br />

negative or positive did not cover the whole word<br />

set, so certa<strong>in</strong> words (e.g., co<strong>in</strong>ed words, clipped<br />

words, proper nouns, or dialects) that were used<br />

considerably <strong>in</strong> Twitter were not verified. Second,<br />

the proposed Anxiety Index considers only negative<br />

terms; it should be improved to consider other<br />

factors that <strong>in</strong>fluence anxiety and <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

language use patterns associated with daily use and<br />

emergency use. Third, s<strong>in</strong>ce the Twitter data<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes contextual <strong>in</strong>formation (e.g., location, time,<br />

and <strong>in</strong>dividual language use patterns) and user<br />

networks <strong>in</strong> retweets. It is necessary to broaden the<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigations to use such data regard<strong>in</strong>g anxiety.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This work was<br />

supported by the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Education of the<br />

Republic of Korea and the National Research<br />

Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015S1A3A2046781)<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Baek, S., Jeong, H., and Kobayashi, K.<br />

(2013) “Disaster anxiety measurement<br />

and corpus-based content analysis of<br />

crisis communication, Systems, Man, and<br />

Cybernetics (SMC), 2013 IEEE<br />

International <strong>Conference</strong> on.<br />

2. Beck, A.T. and Clark, D.A.(1997) "An<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation process<strong>in</strong>g model of anxiety:<br />

Automatic and strategic processes”,<br />

Behaviour Research and Therapy,<br />

35(1):49-58.<br />

3. Jeong, H., Shiramatsu, S., Kobayashi, K.,<br />

and Hatori, T., (2008) "Discourse analysis<br />

of public debates us<strong>in</strong>g corpus l<strong>in</strong>guistic<br />

methodologies", Journal of Computers,<br />

3(8): 58-68.<br />

4. Takamura, h., Inui, T. and Okumura, M.,<br />

(2005) “Extract<strong>in</strong>g Semantic Orientations<br />

of Words us<strong>in</strong>g Sp<strong>in</strong> Model”, Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

of the 43rd Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

Association for Computational L<strong>in</strong>guistics<br />

(ACL2005), pp.133-140.<br />

5. The Great East Japan Earthquake Big<br />

Data Workshop Project 311,<br />

https://sites.google.com/site/prj311/<br />

153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!