17.05.2017 Views

Pan-Pacific Conference XXXIV. Designing New Business Models in Developing Economies

This publication represents the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Pan-Pacific Conference being held in Lima, Peru May 29-31, 2017. The Pan-Pacific Conference has served as an important forum for the exchange of ideas and information for promoting understanding and cooperation among the peoples of the world since 1984. Last year, we had a memorable conference in Miri, Malaysia, in cooperation with Curtin University Sarawak, under the theme of “Building a Smart Society through Innovation and Co-creation.” Professor Pauline Ho served as Chair of the Local Organizing Committee, with strong leadership support of Pro Vice-Chancellor Professor Jim Mienczakowski and Dean Jonathan Winterton.

This publication represents the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Pan-Pacific Conference being held in Lima, Peru May 29-31, 2017. The Pan-Pacific Conference has served as an important forum for the exchange of ideas and information for promoting understanding and cooperation among the peoples of the world since 1984. Last year, we had a memorable conference in Miri, Malaysia, in cooperation with Curtin University Sarawak, under the theme of “Building a Smart Society through Innovation and Co-creation.” Professor Pauline Ho served as Chair of the Local Organizing Committee, with strong leadership support of Pro Vice-Chancellor Professor Jim Mienczakowski and Dean Jonathan Winterton.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

three groups with performance´ differences: (a) firms<br />

with majority family ownership structures (family<br />

sharehold<strong>in</strong>g above 50%), (b) firms with m<strong>in</strong>ority<br />

family ownership structures (family sharehold<strong>in</strong>g<br />

between 10% and 50%), and (c) non-FB. This study<br />

analyzes bus<strong>in</strong>esses with family sharehold<strong>in</strong>g above<br />

50%. Some authors (Smyrnios, Sab<strong>in</strong>e, & Astrachan,<br />

2005) have highlighted that families can exert control<br />

and power over the decisions of the company. In this<br />

research bus<strong>in</strong>esses were classified as FB when three<br />

or fewer families have more than 50% of shares.<br />

Performance: In FB is studied ma<strong>in</strong>ly with ROA<br />

(Anderson & Reeb, 2003; Gonzalez et al., 2012;<br />

Klapper & Love, 2004). In this study the same<br />

parameter was followed.<br />

IOGP: To measure ownership governance practices<br />

were used <strong>in</strong>dependent measurements for each<br />

practice and as a control mechanism was applied an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dex <strong>in</strong>spired <strong>in</strong> the Corporate Governance Country<br />

Code Index (IGCCP <strong>in</strong> spanish) designed by Lagos<br />

and Vec<strong>in</strong>o (2014) from 41 practices of voluntary<br />

adoption def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the Country Code, which<br />

evaluates with 80 questions on the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple "comply<br />

or expla<strong>in</strong>". An assumption of the study was that<br />

survey was validated by the controll<strong>in</strong>g entity<br />

because it has been applied s<strong>in</strong>ce 2008. The IGCCP<br />

not used weight<strong>in</strong>g to assess compliance of each<br />

practice, only apply one (1) when comply or zero (0)<br />

otherwise. Each survey question is l<strong>in</strong>ked to some<br />

practice of the Country Code, when several questions<br />

refer to the same extent, the measurement value is<br />

distributed <strong>in</strong> equal percentages, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

number of questions that assessed. In this research<br />

were selected the practices <strong>in</strong>herent to ownership and<br />

then it was designed the <strong>in</strong>dex of ownership<br />

governance practices (IOGP).<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Strätl<strong>in</strong>g (2003), the functions that<br />

shareholders should play are ma<strong>in</strong>ly keep <strong>in</strong>formed<br />

on the f<strong>in</strong>ancial performance of the company, be<br />

aware of important management decisions, exercise<br />

control over the Board of Directors and executive<br />

management, discuss past performance and build<br />

policies. Based on these guidel<strong>in</strong>es were selected<br />

seven measures established <strong>in</strong> the Country Code that<br />

cover the corporate governance practices for owners.<br />

The measures were M1 (citation), M2 (Board<br />

selection and f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>formation), M4 (Assembly<br />

Agenda), M27 (shareholders attention), M29 (audit),<br />

M34 (Conflict resolution) and M38 (fiscal auditor).<br />

The IOGP is calculated from zero to seven, with<br />

seven as the highest score <strong>in</strong> governance practices of<br />

ownership. The null hypothesis is: there is no<br />

relationship between the IOGP <strong>in</strong> FB and profitability<br />

(Yo1 = ROA). The alternative hypothesis is: the<br />

higher IOGP <strong>in</strong> FB, lower profitability viewed as<br />

ROA (Y1).<br />

Results<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the results obta<strong>in</strong>ed the null hypothesis<br />

is rejected. The regression model for ROA shows<br />

significant results (P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!