17.05.2017 Views

Pan-Pacific Conference XXXIV. Designing New Business Models in Developing Economies

This publication represents the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Pan-Pacific Conference being held in Lima, Peru May 29-31, 2017. The Pan-Pacific Conference has served as an important forum for the exchange of ideas and information for promoting understanding and cooperation among the peoples of the world since 1984. Last year, we had a memorable conference in Miri, Malaysia, in cooperation with Curtin University Sarawak, under the theme of “Building a Smart Society through Innovation and Co-creation.” Professor Pauline Ho served as Chair of the Local Organizing Committee, with strong leadership support of Pro Vice-Chancellor Professor Jim Mienczakowski and Dean Jonathan Winterton.

This publication represents the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Pan-Pacific Conference being held in Lima, Peru May 29-31, 2017. The Pan-Pacific Conference has served as an important forum for the exchange of ideas and information for promoting understanding and cooperation among the peoples of the world since 1984. Last year, we had a memorable conference in Miri, Malaysia, in cooperation with Curtin University Sarawak, under the theme of “Building a Smart Society through Innovation and Co-creation.” Professor Pauline Ho served as Chair of the Local Organizing Committee, with strong leadership support of Pro Vice-Chancellor Professor Jim Mienczakowski and Dean Jonathan Winterton.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Influence of perceived risk and brand equity on purchase <strong>in</strong>tention <strong>in</strong> the<br />

category Colombian soluble coffee<br />

González, G. Elsa. M<br />

CENTRUM Católica Graduate <strong>Bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> School<br />

Elsa González, CENTRUM Católica Graduate <strong>Bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> School, Jr. Daniel Alomía Robles 125, Urb. Los Álamos<br />

de Monterrico, Santiago de Surco, Lima 33, Perú, (0051) 1 62667100<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Different authors have def<strong>in</strong>ed purchase <strong>in</strong>tention<br />

when a person makes a statement as to whether to<br />

buy, or not a product. It has been considered an<br />

important <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>in</strong> market<strong>in</strong>g management to<br />

project sales of new and exist<strong>in</strong>g products [9][20].<br />

The research expects to expand the knowledge <strong>in</strong><br />

purchase <strong>in</strong>tention through brand equity and<br />

perceived risk test<strong>in</strong>g a new the model. The<br />

category selected for the research is one of the most<br />

important <strong>in</strong> Colombia. It expects a growth of 36%<br />

by 2018 reach<strong>in</strong>g USD260,000 million <strong>in</strong> sales [18].<br />

If this category is compared with other categories of<br />

consumption <strong>in</strong> Colombia, only a few of them<br />

expect a growth as such as soluble coffee [36].<br />

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM<br />

To date, there have been numerous studies that<br />

measure the purchase <strong>in</strong>tention, perceived risk, and<br />

brand equity, but It has not found studies measur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

purchase <strong>in</strong>tention through the brand equity and<br />

perceived risk with all set of variables proposed by<br />

the authors: David Aaker (1992) for brand equity<br />

and Roselius (1971) and Jacoby and Kaplan (1972)<br />

for perceived risk. These theories have been so<br />

consistent that they have been used through the<br />

years up to 2016, <strong>in</strong> different researches on different<br />

products like: commercial electronic, technology,<br />

house hold, food, and personal care among others<br />

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM<br />

There are several variables that can affect the<br />

purchase <strong>in</strong>tention [26][7][27][1][9], and suggest<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g more variables to have a better <strong>in</strong>dicator<br />

of purchase <strong>in</strong>tention. The research evaluate if these<br />

constructs when analyzed together <strong>in</strong> the context of<br />

consumption, may <strong>in</strong>crease or decrease the purchase<br />

<strong>in</strong>tention [32][15]. Furthermore, when measur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

purchase <strong>in</strong>tention, us<strong>in</strong>g brand equity and<br />

perceived risk, papers suggest that not all variables<br />

are used<br />

From this po<strong>in</strong>t, it is important to consider more<br />

variables, as this research proposed, <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

understand if they can <strong>in</strong>fluence a customer’s<br />

purchase <strong>in</strong>tention and to what extent. Therefore, If<br />

the <strong>in</strong>dicator of purchase <strong>in</strong>tention <strong>in</strong>creases, it<br />

could be more exact with the predicted sales<br />

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY<br />

This is a quantitative research. The purpose is to<br />

identify how us<strong>in</strong>g all the set of variables of brand<br />

equity and perceived risk, can <strong>in</strong>fluence purchase<br />

<strong>in</strong>tention, of soluble coffee <strong>in</strong> Colombian consumers<br />

and to what extent. The research considers brand<br />

equity and perceived risk as <strong>in</strong>dependent variables<br />

and<br />

attitude as mediat<strong>in</strong>g variable. Purchase <strong>in</strong>tention is<br />

an <strong>in</strong>dependent variable.<br />

LITERATURE REVIEW<br />

Brand Equity<br />

Farquhar (1989) recognized Brand Equity for how it<br />

br<strong>in</strong>gs added value to a product or service. In<br />

seek<strong>in</strong>g to narrow the gap between <strong>in</strong>tention and<br />

behavior, several authors refer to brand equity as a<br />

resource that an organization possesses that<br />

generates preference and advantage over other<br />

brands <strong>in</strong> the market [36]. Different models have<br />

suggested measur<strong>in</strong>g brand equity consider<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

number of dimensions that address different areas of<br />

equity creation [1][24][25].<br />

Aaker (1992), Aaker and Álvarez del Blanco<br />

(1994), and Aaker and Joachimsthaler (2005)<br />

proposed measur<strong>in</strong>g brand equity through a<br />

multidimensional model of four components (a)<br />

brand loyalty, (b) perceived quality, (c) brand<br />

associations and image, and (d) awareness. One<br />

more component is considered <strong>in</strong> Aaker model [1],<br />

it refers to other proprietary brand assets. However,<br />

this component is normally omitted <strong>in</strong> brand equity<br />

research s<strong>in</strong>ce it is not directly related to the<br />

consumer [2][29][14]<br />

Perceived risk<br />

Perceived risk is def<strong>in</strong>ed as the strategy generally<br />

assumed by consumers to m<strong>in</strong>imize or reduce any<br />

negative utility associated with purchas<strong>in</strong>g behavior<br />

[28]. However, the comb<strong>in</strong>ation that <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

make of the variables that <strong>in</strong>fluence their f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

decision, is one of the biggest problems <strong>in</strong> the<br />

purchas<strong>in</strong>g decision analysis<br />

Perceived risk has been considered <strong>in</strong> the literature<br />

as a multidimensional variable that consists six<br />

types of risks: (a) f<strong>in</strong>ancial risk, (b) functional risk,<br />

(c) physical risk, (d) social risk, (e) psychological<br />

risk, and (f) global risk [31][21][23].<br />

Consumer attitude<br />

The concept of attitudes has a central position <strong>in</strong> the<br />

study of consumer behavior Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Ajzen and<br />

Fishbe<strong>in</strong> (1977) attitude has emerged as one of the<br />

most comprehensive theories for the measurement<br />

of attitudes as determ<strong>in</strong>ants of <strong>in</strong>tention. Attitude is<br />

the result of three components that are comprised <strong>in</strong><br />

a comprehensive and <strong>in</strong>clusive manner (a) the<br />

cognitive component, (b) the affective component,<br />

and (c) the behavioral component [5]<br />

[6][13][38][39].<br />

198

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!