17.05.2017 Views

Pan-Pacific Conference XXXIV. Designing New Business Models in Developing Economies

This publication represents the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Pan-Pacific Conference being held in Lima, Peru May 29-31, 2017. The Pan-Pacific Conference has served as an important forum for the exchange of ideas and information for promoting understanding and cooperation among the peoples of the world since 1984. Last year, we had a memorable conference in Miri, Malaysia, in cooperation with Curtin University Sarawak, under the theme of “Building a Smart Society through Innovation and Co-creation.” Professor Pauline Ho served as Chair of the Local Organizing Committee, with strong leadership support of Pro Vice-Chancellor Professor Jim Mienczakowski and Dean Jonathan Winterton.

This publication represents the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Pan-Pacific Conference being held in Lima, Peru May 29-31, 2017. The Pan-Pacific Conference has served as an important forum for the exchange of ideas and information for promoting understanding and cooperation among the peoples of the world since 1984. Last year, we had a memorable conference in Miri, Malaysia, in cooperation with Curtin University Sarawak, under the theme of “Building a Smart Society through Innovation and Co-creation.” Professor Pauline Ho served as Chair of the Local Organizing Committee, with strong leadership support of Pro Vice-Chancellor Professor Jim Mienczakowski and Dean Jonathan Winterton.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Variance Assessment <strong>in</strong> Growth Rates<br />

Fahad Javed Malik<br />

Monash University, Australia<br />

fahad.malik@khi.iba.edu.pk<br />

Mohammed Nishat, Phd<br />

Institute of <strong>Bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> Adm<strong>in</strong>istration (iba), Karachi – Pakistan<br />

mnishat@iba.edu.pk<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The paper <strong>in</strong>vestigates volatility <strong>in</strong> growth rate of<br />

Pakistan’s economy, along with its major trad<strong>in</strong>g<br />

partners <strong>in</strong> Asia; India and Japan and <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

USA as benchmark economy. The volatility has<br />

been measured us<strong>in</strong>g GARCH(1,1) model, the<br />

standardized residuals were not normally<br />

distributed. Then a two state Markov switch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

model is estimated to capture the structural break <strong>in</strong><br />

the variance of growth rate of the four economies.<br />

The variance plots of switch<strong>in</strong>g regimes largely<br />

co<strong>in</strong>cided with conditional variance plots of the<br />

GARCH models.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

For Pakistan, trade represents a substantial share of<br />

gross domestic product. The trad<strong>in</strong>g magnitude and<br />

variance is highly dependent on rate of economic<br />

growth <strong>in</strong> Pakistan. The average growth rate of an<br />

economy can be emphasized on the economic<br />

growth rates or growth <strong>in</strong> GDP per Capita, the<br />

growth rate deviates from it mean depends upon<br />

aggregate <strong>in</strong>vestment and capital accumulation<br />

contribut<strong>in</strong>g towards economic growth. Discuss<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the growth rates among the emerg<strong>in</strong>g markets, there<br />

are other reason that leads to structural volatility due<br />

to under efficient performance of economic and<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions. High volatility <strong>in</strong> GDP, is also<br />

associated to a high budget deficit, underdeveloped<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions hence mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

economy more sensitive to <strong>in</strong>ternational capital<br />

market fluctuations. Similarly, the volatility of per<br />

capita GDP impacted due to liquidity issues <strong>in</strong><br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial markets and limited credit creation.<br />

Therefore, high deviation <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess cycle is<br />

dependent on overall f<strong>in</strong>ancial stability tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to<br />

account the impact national debt level, sav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

generation level and f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>strument operation<br />

etc.<br />

One of the major trad<strong>in</strong>g partners of Pakistan <strong>in</strong><br />

Asia are India and Japan, where India is classified<br />

as newly <strong>in</strong>dustrialized economy and Japan is<br />

termed as developed economy. The US growth rate<br />

is also taken <strong>in</strong>to account as the benchmark<br />

economy to assess overall variance fluctuation <strong>in</strong><br />

GDP. The fluctuation <strong>in</strong> US<br />

growth rate is transmitted to other economies based<br />

on their level of dependence, the paper estimates<br />

growth rate volatility among Pakistan and its trad<strong>in</strong>g<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g GARCH model and then contrasted the results<br />

by us<strong>in</strong>g a two state Markov switch<strong>in</strong>g model is<br />

used to<br />

capture the shifts. Over the time, <strong>in</strong>dustrialization,<br />

globalization, improved technology, mult<strong>in</strong>ational<br />

operations <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g out- sourc<strong>in</strong>g plays an<br />

important role <strong>in</strong> global trade.<br />

The objective of this study is to evaluate variance <strong>in</strong><br />

the growth rate of Pakistan with relation to its major<br />

trad<strong>in</strong>g partners. The rest of the paper is organized<br />

such that section 2 presents the econometric<br />

methodology and data followed by discussion of<br />

results <strong>in</strong> section 3. The conclusion is presented <strong>in</strong><br />

section 5.<br />

MODEL SPECIFICATION<br />

The model is estimated us<strong>in</strong>g the maximum<br />

likelihood method and the likelihood function is<br />

constructed follow<strong>in</strong>g [13]. The specification of<br />

most commonly used models to evaluate overall<br />

volatility or heteroscedasticity is the GARCH model<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced by [5] and then [2] it was further<br />

analyzed by [3]. Later, Hamilton and Susmel (1994)<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced Markov Switch<strong>in</strong>g Autoregressive<br />

conditional heteroscedasticity model (SWARCH)<br />

that allowed ARCH process parameter to come<br />

from one of the several different regimes. This<br />

study confirmed that ARCH effects eventually dies<br />

out, the simplified version is given as;<br />

y t = σ St u t<br />

u t = h t v t<br />

v t ~ i. i. d. with Student t Distribution<br />

2 2<br />

h t = α 0 + α 1 u t−1 + α 2 u t−2<br />

2<br />

+ βd t−1 u t−1<br />

Where σ St captures Markov switch<strong>in</strong>g variances<br />

and the d t−1 is the dummy variable to capture the<br />

leverage effects. In the above specification, ARCH<br />

(2) process is used <strong>in</strong> the model with<strong>in</strong> a given<br />

volatility regime. When the ARCH effect dies out,<br />

this suggest heteroscedasticity <strong>in</strong> GDP growth rate<br />

can be modelled by enforc<strong>in</strong>g Markov switch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

variance model. Therefore, we considered a two<br />

state Markov switch<strong>in</strong>g model:<br />

y ~<br />

t<br />

N <br />

2<br />

(0,<br />

t<br />

)<br />

σ t 2 = σ 1 2 S 1t + σ 2 2 S 2t<br />

232

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!