17.05.2017 Views

Pan-Pacific Conference XXXIV. Designing New Business Models in Developing Economies

This publication represents the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Pan-Pacific Conference being held in Lima, Peru May 29-31, 2017. The Pan-Pacific Conference has served as an important forum for the exchange of ideas and information for promoting understanding and cooperation among the peoples of the world since 1984. Last year, we had a memorable conference in Miri, Malaysia, in cooperation with Curtin University Sarawak, under the theme of “Building a Smart Society through Innovation and Co-creation.” Professor Pauline Ho served as Chair of the Local Organizing Committee, with strong leadership support of Pro Vice-Chancellor Professor Jim Mienczakowski and Dean Jonathan Winterton.

This publication represents the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Pan-Pacific Conference being held in Lima, Peru May 29-31, 2017. The Pan-Pacific Conference has served as an important forum for the exchange of ideas and information for promoting understanding and cooperation among the peoples of the world since 1984. Last year, we had a memorable conference in Miri, Malaysia, in cooperation with Curtin University Sarawak, under the theme of “Building a Smart Society through Innovation and Co-creation.” Professor Pauline Ho served as Chair of the Local Organizing Committee, with strong leadership support of Pro Vice-Chancellor Professor Jim Mienczakowski and Dean Jonathan Winterton.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

conducted <strong>in</strong> ways that dim<strong>in</strong>ishes their <strong>in</strong>fluence on<br />

the physical neighbour<strong>in</strong>g location (Coronado &<br />

Fallon, 2010). It also means leav<strong>in</strong>g the m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g areas<br />

<strong>in</strong> a condition that are acceptable and usable for the<br />

future. To this end, m<strong>in</strong>es have <strong>in</strong>volved their<br />

suppliers to reduce the impact on the environment the<br />

m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g establishmernts. In response, their suppliers<br />

are develop<strong>in</strong>g and us<strong>in</strong>g numerous strategies and<br />

technologies that take sustanable m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account<br />

(Zsolnai, 2011).<br />

Thus, supplier relationships can have a profound<br />

effect on the performance of manufactur<strong>in</strong>g supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong>s (Rao and Holt, 2005; Vachon and Klassen,<br />

2006). Not surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, Carter and Rogers (2008)<br />

recommend that the supplier of raw materials and<br />

components part should to some extent <strong>in</strong>tegrate their<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ability m<strong>in</strong>d-set with the susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />

practices of the buy<strong>in</strong>g firms which the f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

customers identify with. The allocation of specific<br />

resources for jo<strong>in</strong>t activities to address susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />

problems is essential <strong>in</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability collaboration.<br />

These collaborative <strong>in</strong>itiatives are usually based on a<br />

high level of knowledge exchange to facilitate both<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able products and processes (Vachon &<br />

Klassen, 2006). Susta<strong>in</strong>ability collaboration manifests<br />

itself as the direct <strong>in</strong>volvement of an organization<br />

with its suppliers and customers <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

implement<strong>in</strong>g jo<strong>in</strong>t environmental solutions (Vachon<br />

& Klassen, 2008). It signifies the company’s<br />

will<strong>in</strong>gness to allocate resource commitments to<br />

address suppliers’ or customers’ susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />

objectives (Paulraj, 2011). The environmental<br />

collaboration reflects “a good understand<strong>in</strong>g of each<br />

other’s responsibilities and capabilities <strong>in</strong> regard to<br />

environmental management” (Vachon & Klassen,<br />

2008:301). Environmental collaboration is mostly<br />

concerned with design<strong>in</strong>g both environmentally<br />

sound products and processes than on the short-term<br />

outcomes of the environmental efforts (Vachon &<br />

Klassen, 2008).<br />

Increas<strong>in</strong>gly suppliers perceive the need to<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporate susta<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>in</strong>to their bus<strong>in</strong>ess practices<br />

(Carter & Easton, 2011). The critics recommends that<br />

the supplier of raw materials and components part<br />

should to some extent <strong>in</strong>tegrate their susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />

m<strong>in</strong>d-set with the susta<strong>in</strong>ability practices of the focal<br />

firms which the f<strong>in</strong>al customers identify (Carter &<br />

Rogers 2008).<br />

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY<br />

Research approach, selection of participants and<br />

data collection<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the aim of the present study is exploratory <strong>in</strong><br />

nature, it adopted a qualitative research approach. Y<strong>in</strong><br />

(2011) states that the researcher <strong>in</strong> a qualitative<br />

research aims to ascerta<strong>in</strong> a deeper understand<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

the management dilemma and conceptualises ways of<br />

solv<strong>in</strong>g them. M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and M<strong>in</strong>eral <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

Participants <strong>in</strong> this study were selected purposively.<br />

Their selection depended on the judgement,<br />

knowledge and experience of the researchers<br />

(Cresswell & Plano Clark 2011). In this case, they<br />

were selected based on their knowledge of<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ability and supply cha<strong>in</strong> management,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>timate knowledge of the buyer,<br />

namely the m<strong>in</strong>e. For this reason, eleven (11)<br />

respondents were <strong>in</strong>terviewed us<strong>in</strong>g semi-structured<br />

<strong>in</strong>terviews. The <strong>in</strong>terviews were successful <strong>in</strong><br />

convey<strong>in</strong>g an outcome of the <strong>in</strong>formation required.<br />

(Leppelt, 2014). These came from a variety of<br />

suppliers and <strong>in</strong>dustries as shown below. After<br />

<strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g the 11 th respondent, there was no need<br />

for further <strong>in</strong>terviews as the data saturation po<strong>in</strong>t ad<br />

been reached.<br />

Suppliers<br />

Respondents<br />

M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Equipment 2<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g equipment 2<br />

M<strong>in</strong>eral Process<strong>in</strong>g 3<br />

equipment<br />

Extraction equipment 2<br />

and technology<br />

Transport 2<br />

Data analysis<br />

The research data was analysed us<strong>in</strong>g content<br />

analysis. The aim was to convert recorded ‘raw’<br />

phenomenon <strong>in</strong>to data, which was treated <strong>in</strong><br />

essentially a scientific manner so that a body of<br />

knowledge maybe built up (Prasad, 2008). After<br />

collect<strong>in</strong>g all the available data the analysis took<br />

place <strong>in</strong> which the data collected was analysed to<br />

clarify and ref<strong>in</strong>e statements <strong>in</strong> the research and to<br />

reveal all hidden mean<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the text. In this case<br />

data was grouped <strong>in</strong>to themes us<strong>in</strong>g codes. Six<br />

themes emerged from the analysis of the primary<br />

data.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The current study identified a few areas that suppliers<br />

believe they can play a role <strong>in</strong> the promotion of<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry. These are<br />

themes that emerged from the primary data<br />

collection. These <strong>in</strong>clude ensur<strong>in</strong>g a go<strong>in</strong>g concern;<br />

<strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> new technologies; strengthen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

collaboration with m<strong>in</strong>es; a search for alternative<br />

sources of energy; pressure to assist the m<strong>in</strong>es to<br />

comply with environmental regulations and<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutionalis<strong>in</strong>g the culture of susta<strong>in</strong>ability. These<br />

areas are discussed below.<br />

Ensur<strong>in</strong>g a go<strong>in</strong>g concern<br />

The respondents <strong>in</strong>dicated that for them susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />

means ensur<strong>in</strong>g that their companies will exist for the<br />

next generation and that the bus<strong>in</strong>ess will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to<br />

grow so that the bus<strong>in</strong>ess cont<strong>in</strong>ues to add value to<br />

shareholders. A few of them further <strong>in</strong>dicated that<br />

this requires them as suppliers to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a positive<br />

image for their companies which <strong>in</strong> turn means not<br />

harm<strong>in</strong>g the environment. One respondent remarked<br />

that this can be seen from some companies try<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

steer away from coal and gas and stick to gold copper<br />

and plat<strong>in</strong>um uranium used for nuclear power plants<br />

which are cleaner than coal.<br />

253

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!