17.05.2017 Views

Pan-Pacific Conference XXXIV. Designing New Business Models in Developing Economies

This publication represents the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Pan-Pacific Conference being held in Lima, Peru May 29-31, 2017. The Pan-Pacific Conference has served as an important forum for the exchange of ideas and information for promoting understanding and cooperation among the peoples of the world since 1984. Last year, we had a memorable conference in Miri, Malaysia, in cooperation with Curtin University Sarawak, under the theme of “Building a Smart Society through Innovation and Co-creation.” Professor Pauline Ho served as Chair of the Local Organizing Committee, with strong leadership support of Pro Vice-Chancellor Professor Jim Mienczakowski and Dean Jonathan Winterton.

This publication represents the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Pan-Pacific Conference being held in Lima, Peru May 29-31, 2017. The Pan-Pacific Conference has served as an important forum for the exchange of ideas and information for promoting understanding and cooperation among the peoples of the world since 1984. Last year, we had a memorable conference in Miri, Malaysia, in cooperation with Curtin University Sarawak, under the theme of “Building a Smart Society through Innovation and Co-creation.” Professor Pauline Ho served as Chair of the Local Organizing Committee, with strong leadership support of Pro Vice-Chancellor Professor Jim Mienczakowski and Dean Jonathan Winterton.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

significant causes of <strong>in</strong>formation overload, and they<br />

range from; “multiple sources of <strong>in</strong>formation, too<br />

much <strong>in</strong>formation, difficult to manage <strong>in</strong>formation,<br />

irrelevance or unimportance of <strong>in</strong>formation, lack of<br />

time to understand <strong>in</strong>formation”.<br />

RESEARCH DESIGN<br />

A quantitative data collection method was used, <strong>in</strong><br />

the format of a questionnaire. Convenience<br />

sampl<strong>in</strong>g was used to achieve the responses from<br />

205 undergraduate Information Management<br />

students at the University of Johannesburg. Analysis<br />

was done through SPSS. The descriptive statistics<br />

are reported <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

FINDINGS<br />

As far the general demographics go, a total of 205<br />

participants from Information Management 1st year,<br />

second year and third year classes completed the<br />

questionnaire. This survey was also conducted on<br />

two campuses (Auckland Park and Soweto). From<br />

the participants 70% were between the ages of 19-<br />

21 years of age. From the participants 59% were<br />

Males and 41% were Females. As expected, 96% of<br />

the students were registered <strong>in</strong> the Faculty of<br />

Management (the home Faculty for the Information<br />

Management module).<br />

From those participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the survey, a total of<br />

87% owned a smart phone, 72% had a laptop, 50%<br />

owned a tablet and 24% had a desktop computer at<br />

the place of residence. Overall it seems that the<br />

group of students was fairly well connected. UJ<br />

does have a policy that <strong>in</strong>sists that all 1 year<br />

students have a device to connect to the Internet to<br />

conduct their academic work. 72% of the students<br />

claimed that they had a smart phone prior to<br />

enroll<strong>in</strong>g at UJ. The students were asked where they<br />

were access<strong>in</strong>g the Internet (from what location);<br />

47% were us<strong>in</strong>g the Internet on campus, 32% from<br />

their home or place of residence, 16% from the<br />

library, 5% at a café or coffee shop and only 0.5%<br />

were us<strong>in</strong>g the Internet at work.<br />

The students were asked to self-assess their<br />

academic performance, this was important to<br />

understand how they perform and <strong>in</strong>vestigate if<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation overload is affect<strong>in</strong>g their performance.<br />

62% of the students claimed they were perform<strong>in</strong>g<br />

above average, 22% claimed they were adequate,<br />

11% claimed they were exceptional and only 5%<br />

were battl<strong>in</strong>g to cope. The students were also asked<br />

if they were able to f<strong>in</strong>ish their work on time<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g 50% claimed Always, 36% Sometimes,<br />

12% Rarely and 2% Never. The students were asked<br />

if they were confused about what <strong>in</strong>formation to use<br />

is best, 48% <strong>in</strong>dicated Yes, while 42% <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />

Occasionally and only 9% <strong>in</strong>dicated No. 39% of the<br />

participants <strong>in</strong>dicated that they very often f<strong>in</strong>d it<br />

difficult to focus.<br />

Table 1 shows the <strong>in</strong>formation view<strong>in</strong>g activity per<br />

hour. The most notable activity is highlighted <strong>in</strong> red,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to the responses, 12% looked at their text<br />

messages 30 times or more every hour, WhatsApp<br />

usage seemed exceptionally high with 23% of the<br />

students look<strong>in</strong>g at their messages 21-30 times an<br />

hour and 24% checked their messages more than 30<br />

times an hour. Another mentionable responses<br />

recorded was 24% check<strong>in</strong>g their Facebook feeds<br />

21-30 times per hour.<br />

Table 1: Information stream usage per hour<br />

Frequen<br />

cy per<br />

hour<br />

Less than<br />

10<br />

10-20<br />

times<br />

21-30<br />

times<br />

More<br />

than 30<br />

times<br />

Text<br />

SM<br />

S<br />

55<br />

%<br />

26<br />

%<br />

Emai<br />

ls<br />

Wha<br />

ts<br />

App<br />

Instagra<br />

m<br />

Facebo<br />

ok<br />

Twitt<br />

er<br />

66% 29% 55% 45% 78%<br />

20% 24% 22% 23% 13%<br />

8% 8% 23% 17% 24% 3%<br />

12<br />

%<br />

6% 24% 7% 8% 6%<br />

Table 2 shows the resources for collect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation for University related work. The most<br />

used source of <strong>in</strong>formation was a search eng<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

followed by the library database, ebooks and books<br />

and magaz<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

Table 2: Resources used to collect <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

Resources<br />

% of usage<br />

Search eng<strong>in</strong>e 88%<br />

Library database 68%<br />

Books and magaz<strong>in</strong>es 49%<br />

eBooks 58%<br />

The participants were asked if they had sufficient<br />

time to process and filter <strong>in</strong>formation, which helps<br />

gauge to some degree the potential feel<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

overload, 42% <strong>in</strong>dicated they had sufficient time to<br />

process and filter, while 42% <strong>in</strong>dicated occasionally<br />

and 16% claimed they did not have sufficient time<br />

to process and filter <strong>in</strong>formation. The participants<br />

were asked if they were able to resist reply<strong>in</strong>g to a<br />

text message, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g only 23% were able to<br />

resist respond<strong>in</strong>g, 33% most of the time, 36%<br />

occasionally and 8% were unable to resist<br />

respond<strong>in</strong>g. The participants were also asked if they<br />

received too many messages, 32% <strong>in</strong>dicated No,<br />

29% Yes and 39% Occasionally. Lastly the<br />

participants were asked if they were able to<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guish the difference between useful and<br />

distract<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation, most of them (62%) were<br />

able to dist<strong>in</strong>guish the difference, only 3% claim<br />

they could not dist<strong>in</strong>guish and 35% Sometimes.<br />

IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS<br />

From the above descriptive statistics it is very<br />

difficult to determ<strong>in</strong>e whether the students<br />

experience <strong>in</strong>formation overload, some <strong>in</strong>dicators do<br />

suggest they are potentially challenged by the<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation and media channels, <strong>in</strong><br />

many cases students are look<strong>in</strong>g at their phones or<br />

other devices as much as 30 times or more an hour<br />

for messages (difficult to determ<strong>in</strong>e what effect this<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!