A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen
Beverly Mayne Kienzle, Debra L. Stoudt & George Ferzoco, "A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen". BRILL, Leiden - Boston, 2014.
Beverly Mayne Kienzle, Debra L. Stoudt & George Ferzoco, "A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen". BRILL, Leiden - Boston, 2014.
- TAGS
- hildegard-of-bingen
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
122 justin a. s<strong>to</strong>ver<br />
For <strong>Hildegard</strong>, witchcraft is the abuse <strong>of</strong> philosophy. Playing on the double<br />
identifijication <strong>of</strong> Mercury as planet and philosopher,60 <strong>Hildegard</strong> claims<br />
that the ancient sages, having received some knowledge from God and<br />
some from devils, learned <strong>to</strong> manipulate nature through magical means.61<br />
But the divine voice responds <strong>to</strong> this image:<br />
Man is living on the wings <strong>of</strong> rationality . . . But you, o magical art, have a<br />
circle without a point. For when you make many inquiries in the circle <strong>of</strong><br />
creation, creation itself will deprive you <strong>of</strong> honor and riches and will cast<br />
you like a s<strong>to</strong>ne in<strong>to</strong> hell, for you s<strong>to</strong>le the name <strong>of</strong> God for yourself.62<br />
This phrase circulum absque punc<strong>to</strong> is immediately familiar as the reverse<br />
<strong>of</strong> the punctum absque circulo in her letter <strong>to</strong> Odo. Magic manipulates the<br />
efffects <strong>of</strong> created things while denying their concomitant cause in God.<br />
Conversely, academic theologians like Gilbert acknowledge God but deny<br />
his concomitant identity with his divinity and paternity. All <strong>of</strong> them abuse<br />
their rationality.<br />
<strong>Hildegard</strong>’s “Scholastic” Works<br />
In the letters and discourses already discussed, <strong>Hildegard</strong> attempts <strong>to</strong><br />
demonstrate <strong>to</strong> the masters how they ought <strong>to</strong> conduct their scholarship.<br />
sime reperierunt. Hec fortissimi et sapientissimi uiri ex parte a Deo, et ex parte a malignis<br />
spiritibus adinuenerunt. Et quid hoc obfuit? Et sic se ipsos planetas nominauerunt, quoniam<br />
de sole et de luna et de stellis plurimam sapientiam ac multas inquisitiones acceperunt. Ego<br />
autem ubicumque uoluero, in artibus istis regno et dominor: scilicet in luminaribus celi, in<br />
arboribus et in herbis ac in omnibus uirentibus terre, et in bestiis et in animalibus super<br />
terram, ac in uermibus super terram et subtus terram. Et in itineribus meis quis mihi resistet?<br />
Deus omnia creauit: unde in artibus istis illi nullam iniuriam facio.”<br />
60 That is, Hermes Trismegistus, the legendary author <strong>of</strong> the Asclepius, a text which<br />
was enjoying a considerable revival during this period. See Paolo Lucentini, “L’Asclepius<br />
ermetico nel secolo XII,” in From Athens <strong>to</strong> Chartres, pp. 397–420. <strong>Hildegard</strong> may have had<br />
fijirsthand exposure <strong>to</strong> the Asclepius, as Dronke argues (see “Pla<strong>to</strong>nic-Christian Allegories,”<br />
p. 383, n. 11).<br />
61 Imagining philosophers as magicians is not uncommon in the 12th century—there<br />
circulated, for example, a work reputedly by Pla<strong>to</strong> but translated from the Arabic that was<br />
called the Book <strong>of</strong> the Cow; see David Pingree, “Pla<strong>to</strong>’s Hermetic Book <strong>of</strong> the Cow,” in Il Neopla<strong>to</strong>nismo<br />
nel rinascimen<strong>to</strong>, ed. Pietro Prini (Rome, 1993), pp. 133–45. A number <strong>of</strong> magical<br />
works attributed <strong>to</strong> Aris<strong>to</strong>tle also circulated; see Charles Burnett, “Arabic, Greek and Latin<br />
Works on Astrological Magic attributed <strong>to</strong> Aris<strong>to</strong>tle,” in Pseudo-Aris<strong>to</strong>tle in the Middle Ages,<br />
eds. Jill Kraye, William F. Ryan, and Charles B. Schmitt (London, 1986), pp. 84–96.<br />
62 Vite mer., 5.7, p. 223: “Homo in pennis rationalitatis uitalis est, et omne uolatile ac<br />
reptile ex elementis uiuit et mouetur. Et homo sonum in rationalitate habet; reliqua autem<br />
creatura muta est, nec se ipsam nec alios iuuare potest, sed <strong>of</strong>ffijicium suum perfijicit. Tu<br />
autem, o ars magica, circulum absque punc<strong>to</strong> habes. Nam cum in circulo creature multas<br />
sciscitationes inquiris, ipsa creatura honorem et diuitias tibi abstrahet, et uelut lapidem in<br />
infernum proiciet te, quoniam ipsi nomen Dei sui abstulisti.”