25.05.2018 Views

A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen

Beverly Mayne Kienzle, Debra L. Stoudt & George Ferzoco, "A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen". BRILL, Leiden - Boston, 2014.

Beverly Mayne Kienzle, Debra L. Stoudt & George Ferzoco, "A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen". BRILL, Leiden - Boston, 2014.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HILDEGARD OF BINGEN AND THE HIRSAU REFORM<br />

IN GERMANY 1080–1180<br />

Constant J. Mews<br />

<strong>Hildegard</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bingen</strong> rarely displays any debts <strong>to</strong> existing movements <strong>of</strong><br />

religious renewal in Germany. At the beginning <strong>of</strong> Scivias, she describes<br />

how she experienced a moment <strong>of</strong> illumination in the 43rd year <strong>of</strong> her<br />

life, but gives no indication that the monastery where she had been raised<br />

as a child was itself the product <strong>of</strong> any movement in religious reform.1<br />

In reflections preserved by her biographer, she recalls simply that she<br />

was <strong>of</strong>ffered up <strong>to</strong> religious life by her parents in the 8th year <strong>of</strong> her life<br />

(namely, 1105), and that she spoke frequently about visionary experiences<br />

until her 15th year (1112), when she became fearful <strong>of</strong> what others might<br />

say. She implies that she was born in<strong>to</strong> an age <strong>of</strong> spiritual decline, when<br />

Christian fervor had grown slack, and that her early life had lacked a clear<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> direction and commitment.2 Yet we cannot understand the particular<br />

direction <strong>of</strong> her life—both in its early phase at Disibodenberg, and<br />

then after she started <strong>to</strong> assert her spiritual identity in 1141—without reference<br />

<strong>to</strong> a movement <strong>of</strong> religious renewal that had been evolving within<br />

German monasticism since the 11th century, in particular that associated<br />

with the abbey <strong>of</strong> Hirsau.<br />

Because <strong>Hildegard</strong> was technically Benedictine in her observance (not<br />

a term she would have known), it is <strong>of</strong>ten assumed that she belonged<br />

<strong>to</strong> an “unreformed” monasticism, more traditional in character than that<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Cistercian Order, which based itself around strict observance <strong>of</strong><br />

the Rule <strong>of</strong> Benedict. This assumption—that 12th-century monasticism<br />

can itself be divided in<strong>to</strong> two primary groupings, one traditional and<br />

Benedictine, the other innovative and Cistercian—is itself shaped by the<br />

polemical literature generated by the Cistercian reform, in particular by<br />

its preeminent publicist, Bernard <strong>of</strong> Clairvaux. His Apologia for the Cistercian<br />

way <strong>of</strong> life, addressed <strong>to</strong> William <strong>of</strong> St Thierry in the mid-1120s, has<br />

had great influence in creating the impression that prior <strong>to</strong> the establishment<br />

<strong>of</strong> Cîteaux and the Cistercian way <strong>of</strong> life in 1098, monasticism—at<br />

1 Scivias, “Protestifijicatio,” p. 3.<br />

2 V. Hild., 2.2, p. 23.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!