25.05.2018 Views

A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen

Beverly Mayne Kienzle, Debra L. Stoudt & George Ferzoco, "A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen". BRILL, Leiden - Boston, 2014.

Beverly Mayne Kienzle, Debra L. Stoudt & George Ferzoco, "A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen". BRILL, Leiden - Boston, 2014.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

298 michael embach<br />

Jacobus de Guisia: Annales his<strong>to</strong>riae illustrium principum Hanoniae<br />

(composed c.1400–1414). (MGH SS 30) Hannover, 1896, pp. 44–334,<br />

dated here as 1165, see p. 221, ll. 9–14.<br />

Thomas Eberndorfer (1388–1464): Chronica Pontifijicum Romanorum<br />

(composed c.1458–1464). (MGH SS Rerum Germanicarum. N.S. vol. 16).<br />

Munich, 1994, dated here as 1148/1152, see: p. 384, ll. 9–16.<br />

Medical and Scientifijic Works<br />

In her Liber vite meri<strong>to</strong>rum, <strong>Hildegard</strong> mentions only a single medical or<br />

scientifijic text, the Liber subtilitatum diuersarum naturarum creaturarum.<br />

This work, for which there is no textual evidence from the author’s lifetime,<br />

apparently was divided between 1179 and c.1220 in<strong>to</strong> two separate<br />

texts. It is possible that the division resulted from effforts <strong>to</strong> represent <strong>Hildegard</strong><br />

with a more subtle pr<strong>of</strong>ijile as a healer within the context <strong>of</strong> the<br />

planned canonization proceedings. In any case, the Acta canonisationis<br />

and the Pentachronon both cite two, separate works: the Liber simplicis<br />

medicinae (Physica) and the Liber compositae medicinae (Cause et cure<br />

[Cause]). <strong>Hildegard</strong> herself referred <strong>to</strong> the Liber subtilitatum diuersarum<br />

as a visio, thereby elevating it <strong>to</strong> the same status as her visionary works.<br />

In contrast <strong>to</strong> the visionary texts, no manuscripts <strong>of</strong> the scientifijic works<br />

exist that can be closely linked with the author herself: the earliest extant<br />

manuscripts were written in the second half <strong>of</strong> the 13th century. These<br />

include the manuscripts in Copenhagen (Kongelike Bibliotek, Ny kgl. 90b<br />

2° [Cause]) and Florence (Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Ashb. 1323<br />

[Physica]). Both manuscripts originated in Trier: the Cause was copied<br />

in St Maximin’s abbey, while the Physica was created in the abbey <strong>of</strong><br />

Sts Eucharius and Matthias. As has already been demonstrated in the<br />

copious transmission <strong>of</strong> the visionary texts, Trier and its important Benedictine<br />

monasteries appear again as a powerful center for the cultivation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Hildegard</strong>’s auc<strong>to</strong>ritas.<br />

There are, however, diffferences: the Cause contains more non-<strong>Hildegard</strong>ian<br />

material than the Physica, and the medical and scientifijic works<br />

have a far more sparsely documented manuscript transmission. The Physica<br />

exists in fijive complete texts and eight fragments, while the Cause is<br />

attested in one complete and one fragmentary manuscript.32 A connection<br />

32 Individual citations can be found in: Embach, Die Schriften <strong>Hildegard</strong>s von <strong>Bingen</strong>,<br />

pp. 307–62 and 374–85.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!