25.05.2018 Views

A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen

Beverly Mayne Kienzle, Debra L. Stoudt & George Ferzoco, "A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen". BRILL, Leiden - Boston, 2014.

Beverly Mayne Kienzle, Debra L. Stoudt & George Ferzoco, "A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen". BRILL, Leiden - Boston, 2014.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

st disibod and the his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> the disibodenberg 47<br />

<strong>to</strong> 843 and particularly afffected the areas on the western side <strong>of</strong> the Rhine.<br />

The great feuds that occurred around the year 900 and in the following<br />

decades caused even more sufffering, in particular <strong>to</strong> the churches and<br />

monasteries.<br />

It is in this sense that one can consider <strong>Hildegard</strong>’s presentation <strong>of</strong><br />

these themes as “the author’s deeply-anchored, his<strong>to</strong>rical consciousness,”<br />

a “sense for multiple determining fac<strong>to</strong>rs, courses <strong>of</strong> events, and motifs.”30<br />

Those whom <strong>Hildegard</strong> did not mention are just as notable: aside from<br />

Boniface, Charlemagne, and Liuthard, <strong>Hildegard</strong> does not name any <strong>of</strong> the<br />

other active participants by name, neither the “evil” bishop <strong>of</strong> Mainz, who<br />

despoiled the Disibodenberg, nor the “good” archbishops, who established<br />

canons and monks, respectively, on the mountain. <strong>Hildegard</strong>’s reticence<br />

with names (on the mountain, Hat<strong>to</strong> II was considered <strong>to</strong> be one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

guilty parties)31 should not be unders<strong>to</strong>od as clemency. She pilloried the<br />

archbishop as the primary guilty party and has Willigis lament that he has<br />

become wealthy and powerful due <strong>to</strong> the unjust alienation <strong>of</strong> the monastery’s<br />

lands. Yet it should also be noted that <strong>Hildegard</strong>, a staunch Benedictine,<br />

does not imply that Willigis would/should have settled Benedictines<br />

on the site, nor does she criticize the canons in any way, even though she<br />

naturally welcomes Ruthard’s selection <strong>of</strong> brothers from her own order <strong>to</strong><br />

succeed them.32<br />

The Charters from 1108 and 1128: From Archbishops Ruthard and Adalbert<br />

In contrast <strong>to</strong> the Vita Disibodi, Ruthard’s 1108 charter,33 which was initially<br />

transmitted in a Vidimus written in 1268 (and thus after the takeover<br />

<strong>of</strong> the monastery by the Cistercians), begins with the reform <strong>of</strong> the lax life<br />

that the canons had practiced and which Ruthard, inspired by the veneration<br />

<strong>of</strong> the saint and the fama <strong>of</strong> the monastic life that had once ruled<br />

here, replaced again with the stricter and better life <strong>of</strong> monks. This conforms<br />

<strong>to</strong> classic monastic rhe<strong>to</strong>ric <strong>of</strong> reform that was current at that time.<br />

Yet even Ruthard did not claim that Willigis had actually wanted <strong>to</strong> settle<br />

monks on the mountain, even if a note <strong>of</strong> regret found in the wording<br />

30 Haverkamp, “<strong>Hildegard</strong> von Disibodenberg-<strong>Bingen</strong>,” in Umfeld, pp. 29–30. “ein tief<br />

verankertes his<strong>to</strong>risches Bewusstsein der Au<strong>to</strong>rin,” “Sinn für vielfältige Rahmenbedingungen,<br />

Ereignisabläufe und Handlungsmotive.”<br />

31 Annales Sancti Disibodi a. 975, ed. Georg Waitz, MGH SS 7:6.<br />

32 V. Disib., AA.SS., p. 597; PL 197:1114; Two Hagiographies, pp. 152–53.<br />

33 MzUB, 436.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!