A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen
Beverly Mayne Kienzle, Debra L. Stoudt & George Ferzoco, "A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen". BRILL, Leiden - Boston, 2014.
Beverly Mayne Kienzle, Debra L. Stoudt & George Ferzoco, "A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen". BRILL, Leiden - Boston, 2014.
- TAGS
- hildegard-of-bingen
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
140 kienzle and stevens<br />
monks at Villers, sought the magistra’s opinion on 38 problems <strong>of</strong> scriptural<br />
interpretation, <strong>to</strong> which she responded with the Solutiones triginta<br />
oc<strong>to</strong> quaestionum.9<br />
Moreover, while the magistra employs the form <strong>of</strong> a letter here, the text<br />
clearly presents itself in a sermon-like discourse that recalls a mixed genre,<br />
sometimes called the sermo epis<strong>to</strong>laris.10 <strong>Hildegard</strong> punctuates the letter<br />
with a number <strong>of</strong> simple questions, asking repeatedly, “What is said?”<br />
(Quid dicitur?). The questions engage the reader in a sort <strong>of</strong> exegetical<br />
conversation that places the letter between written and oral discourse.<br />
The magistra structures the core <strong>of</strong> this sermo epis<strong>to</strong>laris around the<br />
four animals described in Ezekiel 1 and 10 and by John the Evangelist in<br />
Revelation 4:6–9: the lion, the calf, the human-faced creature, and the<br />
flying eagle.11 The letter thus <strong>of</strong>ffers an exegesis <strong>of</strong> the relevant passage in<br />
Revelation as much as it does <strong>of</strong> Ezekiel.<br />
The magistra asserts the standard medieval interpretation that the four<br />
creatures represent the four evangelists.12 She discusses at some length<br />
the roles <strong>of</strong> angels and ministers <strong>of</strong> God, as well as God’s miracles, and<br />
presence in divine fijire. <strong>Hildegard</strong> uses the word ignis several times here,<br />
9 The Solutiones are contained within the Epis<strong>to</strong>lae, fols 328ra–434ra, Wiesbaden,<br />
Hessische Landesbibliothek 2; PL 197:1037–54. On the content, see Bartlett, “Commentary,<br />
Polemic and Prophecy,” pp. 153–65; and on the genre, see Nikolaus M. Häring, “Commentary<br />
and Hermeneutics,” in Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century, eds. Robert L.<br />
Benson and Giles Constable with Carol Lanham, Medieval Academy Reprints for Teaching<br />
26 (Toron<strong>to</strong>, 1991), pp. 173–200, at p. 177.<br />
10 See Beverly Mayne Kienzle, “The Twelfth-Century Monastic Sermon,” in The Sermon,<br />
ed. Beverly Mayne Kienzle, Typologie des sources du Moyen Âge occidental, fasc. 81–83<br />
(Turnhout, 2000), pp. 275, 280. Sermons, letters, and exegetical discourses showed common<br />
characteristics in 12th-century monastic circles. On monastic letters, see Giles Constable,<br />
Letters and Letter Collections, Typologie des sources du Moyen Âge occidental, fasc.<br />
17 (Turnhout, 1976); Beverly Mayne Kienzle, “New Introduction,” The Letters <strong>of</strong> St. Bernard<br />
<strong>of</strong> Clairvaux, trans. Bruno Scott James (Stroud, 1998), pp. vii–xvii.<br />
11 Rev. 4:6: “Et in conspectu sedis tamquam mare vitreum simile cristallo et in medio<br />
sedis et in circuitu sedis quattuor animalia plena oculis ante et retro.” Exegesis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
animals in the books <strong>of</strong> these two visionary prophets dates back <strong>to</strong> Irenaeus <strong>of</strong> Lyons and<br />
is reinforced by Augustine. See Angela Russell Christman, What Did Ezekiel See? Christian<br />
Exegesis <strong>of</strong> Ezekiel’s Vision <strong>of</strong> the Chariot from Irenaeus <strong>to</strong> Gregory the Great (Leiden, 2005),<br />
p. 16. Gregory does not connect the four creatures in Ezekiel <strong>to</strong> Revelation; see Gregory the<br />
Great, Homiliae in Hiezechihelem prophetam, I, 6.10–17, pp. 72–77.<br />
12 Letters, 1, 84R, p. 183; Epis<strong>to</strong>larium, I, 84R, p. 190, ll. 12–18: “In medio sedis et in circuitu<br />
sedis quattuor animalia, plena oculis ante et retro. Quod dicitur: In fortitudine potestatis<br />
Dei, qui Deus et homo est, et in omni parte quo potestas ipsius extenditur, quattuor euangelistis<br />
imbuti fijideles Dei ruminantes et plenitudinem circumspectionis uirtutum habentes<br />
esse debent, ita quod uideant unde facti processerint et quod etiam uideant quid futuri<br />
sint.” See note 10 above on Gregory the Great’s cementing <strong>of</strong> this interpretation and on its<br />
representation in medieval art; see also Fromaget, Le symbolisme des quatre vivants.