A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen
Beverly Mayne Kienzle, Debra L. Stoudt & George Ferzoco, "A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen". BRILL, Leiden - Boston, 2014.
Beverly Mayne Kienzle, Debra L. Stoudt & George Ferzoco, "A Companion to Hildegard of Bingen". BRILL, Leiden - Boston, 2014.
- TAGS
- hildegard-of-bingen
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
124 justin a. s<strong>to</strong>ver<br />
this method. <strong>Hildegard</strong>, however, weaves her commentary in<strong>to</strong> the biblical<br />
pericope, producing a single, integrated passage with two parallel narratives,<br />
which Beverly Kienzle has described as “intratextual glosses.”69 While<br />
<strong>Hildegard</strong>’s discourses were composed for a monastic audience within a<br />
monastic milieu, her method closely resembles the catena commentary,<br />
a method <strong>of</strong> exposition employed in the schools <strong>of</strong> northern France in<br />
the 12th century by masters such as Bernard <strong>of</strong> Chartres and William <strong>of</strong><br />
Conches for glossing ancient literary and philosophical texts, like Cicero’s<br />
Rhe<strong>to</strong>rica, Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Pla<strong>to</strong>’s Timaeus, and Boethius’s Consolatio.70<br />
Contemporaries called this sort <strong>of</strong> gloss continuative producta,<br />
“drawn out in a continuous fashion,” or as Häring explains it, combining<br />
the text commented upon, the commenta<strong>to</strong>r’s own words, and the words<br />
<strong>of</strong> the source material in<strong>to</strong> an integral whole.71 This resemblance suggests<br />
that the investiga<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hildegard</strong>’s method <strong>of</strong> glossing should look <strong>to</strong> 12thcentury<br />
scholastic rather than monastic practice.<br />
<strong>Hildegard</strong> was not the fijirst exegete <strong>to</strong> apply this method <strong>of</strong> scholarship<br />
<strong>to</strong> a biblical text. A student <strong>of</strong> Bernard <strong>of</strong> Chartres and colleague <strong>of</strong><br />
William <strong>of</strong> Conches, Gilbert <strong>of</strong> Poitiers himself employed precisely this<br />
method <strong>of</strong> exposition in his commentaries on the psalter, which were substantially<br />
completed before 1117 but did not circulate widely before 1140.72<br />
Theresa Gross-Diaz has demonstrated how Gilbert derived his method <strong>of</strong><br />
69 Ibid., p. 115.<br />
70 This style <strong>of</strong> commentary was also found in Germany, albeit less widely. The Glossa<br />
coloniensis on Macrobius (composed probably in the Rhineland, c.1100) <strong>of</strong>ffers a less developed<br />
example <strong>of</strong> this sort. Bernard <strong>of</strong> Chartres’ Glosae super Pla<strong>to</strong>nem is, however, extant in<br />
three late 12th-century manuscripts <strong>of</strong> German provenance. See Peter Dronke, The Spell <strong>of</strong><br />
Calcidius: Pla<strong>to</strong>nic Concepts and Images in the Medieval West (Florence, 2008), pp. 138–40.<br />
71 This phrase is used by Robert <strong>of</strong> Auxerre in his Chronicon MGH SS 26.237, and quoted<br />
by Nikolaus Häring, “Commentary and Hermeneutics,” in Renaissance and Renewal in the<br />
Twelfth Century, eds. Robert Benson and Giles Constable with Carol Lanham, Medieval<br />
Academy Reprints for Teaching 26 (Cambridge, Mass., 1982), pp. 180–81. See below for an<br />
example <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> commentary.<br />
72 On this commentary, see the monograph by Theresa Gross-Diaz, The Psalms Commentary<br />
<strong>of</strong> Gilbert <strong>of</strong> Poitiers: From Lectio Divina <strong>to</strong> the Lecture Room (Leiden, 1996). It has<br />
never been fully edited. In 1930 Maria Fontana edited the prologue and the commentary<br />
on the fijirst three psalms, in “Il commen<strong>to</strong> ai Salmi di Gilber<strong>to</strong> della Porrée,” Logos 13 (1930):<br />
283–301. In 1963 Ada Pagliari edited the prologue again, in “Il presun<strong>to</strong> commen<strong>to</strong> ai Salmi<br />
di S. Lorenzo Giustiniani opera di Gilber<strong>to</strong> Porretano,” Aevum 36 (1962): 414–29. Several<br />
brief selections are also printed in Gross-Diaz’s monograph. The numerous manuscripts <strong>of</strong><br />
the commentary are listed in Nikolaus Häring, “Handschriftliches zu den Werken Gilberts<br />
Bisch<strong>of</strong> von Poitiers,” Revue d’his<strong>to</strong>ire des textes 8 (1978): 133–94, supplemented by Gross-<br />
Diaz, ibid., pp. 160–80.