14.01.2013 Views

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

84 A Psychology of <strong>Interrogations</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Confessions</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> an admission was made. It was often the case that an admission (without<br />

the element of intent) could relate to being at a relevant location <strong>and</strong> would<br />

often be made prior to a confession.<br />

Negative Responses<br />

These related to denials by the suspect or instances where he or she disputed<br />

an account or declined to agree to a remark. This section also included a<br />

challenging response where the suspect identified or perceived an inference that<br />

was implied within the body of the question, <strong>and</strong> which he was not prepared<br />

to accept (e.g. ‘You didn’t hear me say that, <strong>and</strong> you are putting words into my<br />

mouth now’). The right to silence (full or part) was included, but was very rarely<br />

invoked in this sample. A more common response was for the suspect to volunteer<br />

that he couldn’t remember <strong>and</strong> very occasionally a no reply was entered,<br />

where perhaps the suspect did not have time to answer, as opposed to exercising<br />

his right to silence. Withdraws a confession was also included in this category.<br />

Information or Knowledge<br />

During the course of an interview a suspect might seek additional information<br />

from the officer to clarify an issue or he might ask for specific information in<br />

relation to early release or the likely disposal route for his particular predicament.<br />

This category also included where the suspect asked the officer to repeat<br />

the question.<br />

Rationalization<br />

In this section the suspect might minimize the offence or his responsibility for<br />

it. This would also include where the suspect accepted a scenario or theme that<br />

might have been suggested by the officers or where the suspect provides a motive<br />

or reason for the offence.<br />

Projection<br />

These include references by the suspect who might apportion blame to some<br />

other party or the victim (Inbau, Reid & Buckley, 1986; see Chapter 1, where<br />

these processes are dealt with in more detail).<br />

Emotional Responses<br />

The suspect may sound distressed or cry, <strong>and</strong> complain of feeling tired or low.<br />

This may coincide with a period of self-blame or remorse <strong>and</strong> their speech pattern<br />

may give some indication that they are confused, perhaps they do not<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> a straightforward question, or they show signs of a lack of orientation.<br />

They become abusive or angry <strong>and</strong> raise their voice, or they may seek<br />

assistance. A combination of some of these responses may be indicative of a<br />

psychologically vulnerable individual.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!