14.01.2013 Views

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

52 A Psychology of <strong>Interrogations</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Confessions</strong><br />

Unlike Inbau, Reid <strong>and</strong> Buckley (1986), Walkley acknowledged that some<br />

interrogation techniques can result in a false confession being elicited. He states:<br />

Perhaps even more powerfully, if an interviewer wrongly assesses the truth teller<br />

as a lie teller he may subject that suspect to questioning of a type which induces<br />

a false confession. Whilst instances of false confessions may not be as common<br />

as some would have us believe, there are well documented cases where they have<br />

occurred, <strong>and</strong> apart from the obvious damage they do to the suspect they also bring<br />

the police service <strong>and</strong> the legitimate practice of interrogation into disrepute (p. 5).<br />

Walkley’s comments imply recognition that police officers can misjudge deception<br />

(i.e. they are not infallible in reading the ‘lie’ <strong>and</strong> ‘buy’ signs); when this<br />

occurs it influences the tactics they use to break down resistance, this in turn<br />

increases the likelihood of a false confession occurring, <strong>and</strong> brings the practice<br />

of interrogation into disrepute.<br />

Walkley’s interrogation h<strong>and</strong>book did not meet with much enthusiasm in<br />

Britain <strong>and</strong> it does not appear to have had much impact on police training <strong>and</strong><br />

interrogation techniques used by police interviewers. There were a number of<br />

reasons for this, as follows.<br />

1. Changes in police practice following the introduction of PACE <strong>and</strong> Codes<br />

of Practice for police officers, which reduced the scope for coercive questioning,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the use of deception, trickery <strong>and</strong> psychological manipulation<br />

(Bull, 1999; McKenzie, 1994; Mortimer & Shepherd, 1999; Williamson,<br />

1994).<br />

2. Research into false confessions <strong>and</strong> psychological vulnerability<br />

(Gudjonsson, 1983, 1984a, 1984b, 1992a; Gudjonsson & MacKeith, 1982,<br />

1988, 1990), <strong>and</strong> the increased recognition by the judiciary that ‘wrongful<br />

convictions may be occasioned by false confessions <strong>and</strong> psychological<br />

vulnerability’ (Corre, 1995, p. 9).<br />

3. The successful appeal of the ‘Guildford Four’ in October 1989 <strong>and</strong><br />

‘Birmingham Six’ in March 1991 raised public <strong>and</strong> judicial awareness about<br />

wrongful convictions arising from coerced confessions (Gudjonsson, 1992a).<br />

This was followed in May 1992 by the successful appeal of Judith Ward<br />

(Gudjonsson & MacKeith, 1997; Kennedy, 1992; Ward, 1993). These three<br />

cases, dating back to 1974, all involved major terrorist offences <strong>and</strong> multiple<br />

deaths of members of the public. The case of the ‘Birmingham Six’ led<br />

to the setting up of the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice (1993).<br />

4. Increased acceptance by the English Crown Courts of expert psychological<br />

evidence in the late 1980s, followed by the successful appeal of the<br />

‘Tottenham Three’ in December 1991 (R. v. Raghip, The Independent, Friday<br />

6 December 1991, p. 19; Rose, 1992; see Chapter 18 in this book). For the<br />

admissibility of psychological evidence in cases of disputed confessions, <strong>and</strong><br />

the introduction of the concept of ‘interrogative suggestibility’, this was the<br />

most important <strong>and</strong> influential judgment <strong>and</strong> is discussed in Part III along<br />

with other more recent judgments.<br />

5. In December 1992 there was an important <strong>and</strong> influential legal judgment<br />

concerning ‘oppressive’ police interviewing in the case of the ‘Cardiff Three’

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!