14.01.2013 Views

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Effects of Drugs <strong>and</strong> Alcohol upon the Reliability of Testimony 419<br />

the management of opiate addicts in police custody. These articles provide a<br />

useful conceptual framework for assessing the difficulties that can arise when<br />

opiate addicts are interviewed in custody.<br />

Lader (1999) also provides a useful review article on the varied effects of<br />

drugs on the behaviour of potential witnesses. The focus in his article is on<br />

prescribed drugs, although the effects of illicit drugs <strong>and</strong> alcohol are also discussed.<br />

The limitations of this article are that it does not provide a good review<br />

of studies directly relevant to the management of drug addicts in police custody,<br />

<strong>and</strong> there is no discussion on the effects of withdrawal symptoms on the validity<br />

of witnesses’ accounts.<br />

According to Lader (1999), generally speaking, drugs will either increase<br />

nervous activity in the brain or decrease it. However, drugs, including alcohol<br />

<strong>and</strong> other sedatives, may produce a ‘biphasic’ response depending upon the<br />

dose consumed. For example, at low doses alcohol <strong>and</strong> tranquillizers will decrease<br />

inhibitory activity of the highest functions of the brain, which has the<br />

effect of increasing general brain activity, whereas at higher doses, the excitation<br />

of the brain is directly reduced <strong>and</strong> the person may become withdrawn<br />

<strong>and</strong> less active (e.g. alcohol consumption may initially make the person more<br />

open <strong>and</strong> talkative, but with increased intake of alcohol he or she may become<br />

withdrawn).<br />

Lader (1999) lists the types of drug that he considers are relevant to the<br />

validity of testimony as follows.<br />

� Drugs prescribed to treat psychiatric disorders. These include tranquillizers,<br />

sleeping tablets, antidepressants <strong>and</strong> antipsychotics.<br />

� Drugs used to treat neurological disorders that have psychological sideeffects<br />

(e.g. anticonvulsants <strong>and</strong> antiparkinsonian drugs).<br />

� Drugs used to treat non-nervous disorders that in some cases may have<br />

psychological side-effects.<br />

� Illicit drugs, which are used by drug addicts in non-medical contexts.<br />

� Alcohol, which has sedative effects similar to that of tranquillizers.<br />

According to Lader, the main drug-induced states that are relevant to testimony<br />

are sedation, disinhibition, paradoxical reactions <strong>and</strong> alterations in concentration,<br />

memory <strong>and</strong> learning. Paradoxical reactions do sometimes occur with<br />

drugs (i.e. these are reactions that are opposite to those normally expected). This<br />

includes, for example, increased anxiety, anger <strong>and</strong> violent outbursts, which<br />

is sometimes seen during alcohol intoxication. There is no mention by Lader<br />

of how alcohol <strong>and</strong>/or drugs may influence the person’s suggestibility during<br />

interviewing.<br />

Tranquillizers <strong>and</strong> other sedatives, except at the lowest doses, will impair<br />

cognitive functions, such as concentration, memory <strong>and</strong> learning, in normal<br />

individuals. Among highly anxious persons these cognitive functions are often<br />

already impaired due to the high level of anxiety, <strong>and</strong> a low to moderate dose of<br />

a sedative may reduce the level of anxiety to the extent that cognitive functions<br />

are improved. However, at high doses it is likely that the anxiety-relieving properties<br />

of the drug will not outweigh its direct depressant effects, thus leaving<br />

the person’s cognitive impairment no better than it was, or even exacerbating it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!