14.01.2013 Views

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Psychological Assessment 319<br />

Royal Commission study (Gudjonsson et al., 1993), extreme fear of being locked<br />

up in a police cell was uncommon (i.e. only one case out of 171), although many<br />

detainees complained that they were distressed about being locked up at the<br />

police station. The most common anxiety was in relation to uncertainties over<br />

their current predicament. Detainees expressed concern over what was going to<br />

happen to them, kept asking the researchers for information about their detention<br />

<strong>and</strong> wanted to know when they were likely to be interviewed by the police.<br />

Occasionally, detainees are in a state of bereavement when interviewed by<br />

the police due their having lost a loved one, such as a spouse or a child. This<br />

may make them vulnerable to giving unreliable statements because of feelings<br />

of guilt <strong>and</strong> subjective distress that typically accompanies the condition.<br />

Drug <strong>and</strong> alcohol intoxication <strong>and</strong> withdrawal sometimes occur during interviewing<br />

<strong>and</strong> the effects of this are discussed in detail in Chapter 15.<br />

Medical complaints (e.g. cardiovascular problems, epilepsy, diabetes) can result<br />

in a disturbed or abnormal mental state while the person is interviewed<br />

by the police. This may adversely influence the accuracy <strong>and</strong> reliability of their<br />

account <strong>and</strong> the ability to function in a stressful situation.<br />

Intellectual Abilities<br />

Limited intellectual abilities, not amounting to learning disability, can influence<br />

the ability of witnesses <strong>and</strong> suspects to underst<strong>and</strong> questions, articulate<br />

their answers <strong>and</strong> appreciate the implications of their answers. As shown in<br />

Chapter 3, many detainees interviewed at police stations are of low intelligence<br />

(Gudjonsson et al., 1993). Nine per cent of the sample in the Royal Commission<br />

study had a prorated IQ score below 70, compared with about 2% of the general<br />

population; one-third (34%) had a prorated IQ score of 75 or below (i.e. bottom<br />

5% of the general population). The findings indicate that the police commonly<br />

interview suspects of low intellectual abilities. It is of interest to note that<br />

the majority of appellants whose convictions have been overturned on the basis<br />

of unreliable confessions have been of borderline or low average intelligence,<br />

similar to those of the average police detainee (Chapter 18).<br />

Personality Characteristics<br />

There are a number of personality characteristics that may be relevant<br />

<strong>and</strong> important when evaluating the reliability of confession statements. The<br />

three most extensively researched variables are suggestibility, compliance <strong>and</strong><br />

acquiescence (Clare & Gudjonsson, 1993; Gudjonsson, 1992a).<br />

More recently confabulation has been investigated in relation to the reliability<br />

of verbal accounts given by witnesses (Clare & Gudjonsson, 1993;<br />

Sigurdsson, Gudjonsson, Kolbeinsson & Petursson, 1994). Extreme confabulation<br />

has been found in some cases of personality disorder, which was evident<br />

in the cases of Judith Ward, Joe Giarratano <strong>and</strong> John Wille (see Chapters 18<br />

<strong>and</strong> 21). Persons with mental disorder, such as learning disability <strong>and</strong> severe<br />

depression, have impaired memory recall for events, but the accuracy of their<br />

accounts is not undermined by a heightened tendency to confabulate (Clare &<br />

Gudjonsson, 1993; Sigurdsson et al., 1994).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!