Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

References 635
Cardone, D. & Dent, H. (1996). Memory and interrogative suggestibility: the effects of
modality of information presentation and retrieval conditions upon the suggestibility
scores of people with learning disabilities. Legal and Criminological Psychology,
1 (Part 2), 165–177.
Carlsmith, J.M. & Gross, A.E. (1969). Some effects of guilt on compliance. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 232–239.
Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F. & Weintraub, J.K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: a
theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2),
267–283.
Cassell, P.G. (1996a). Miranda’s social costs: an empirical reassessment. Northwestern
University Law Review, 90, 387–499.
Cassell, P.G. (1996b). All benefits, no costs: the grand illusion of Miranda’s defenders.
Northwestern University Law Review, 90, 1084–1124.
Cassell, P.G. (1998a). The statue that time forgot: 18 U.S.C. 3501 and the overhauling
of Miranda. Iowa Law Review, 85, 175–259.
Cassell, P.G. (1998b). Protecting the innocent from false confessions and lost
confessions—and from Miranda. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88,
497–556.
Cassell, P.G. (1999). The guilty and the ‘innocent’: an examination of alleged cases of
wrongful conviction from false confessions. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy,
22, 523–603.
Cassell, P.G. & Fowles, R. (1998). Handcuffing the cops? A thirty-year perspective on
Miranda’s harmful effects on law enforcement. Stanford Law Review, 50, 1055–1145.
Cassell, P.G. & Hayman, B.S. (1998). Police interrogation in the 1990s: an empirical
study of the effects of Miranda. In R.A. Leo and G.C. Thomas III (Eds), The Miranda
debate, justice and policing. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 222–235.
Cattell, J.M. (1895). Measurements of the accuracy of recollection. Science, 2, 761–766.
Ceci, S.J. & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: a historical review and
synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403–439.
Ceci, S.J. & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: a scientific analysis of children’s
testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Ceci, S.J., Ross, D.F. & Toglia, M.P. (1987). Age differences in suggestibility: narrowing
the uncertainties. In S.J. Ceci, M.P. Toglia and D.F. Ross (Eds), Children’s eyewitness
memory. New York: Springer, 79–91.
Cho, K. (1999). Reconstruction of the English criminal justice system and its reinvigorated
exclusionary rules. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law
Journal, 21, 259–312.
Choo, A.L.-T. & Nash, S. (1999). What’s the matter with Section 78? Criminal Law
Review, December, 927–1006.
Cialdini, R.B. (1993). Influence. The psychology of persuasion. New York: Quill William
Morrow.
Clare, I.C.H. & Gudjonsson, G.H. (1991). Recall and understanding of the caution and
rights in police detention amongst persons of average intellectual ability and persons
with a mental handicap. Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology, 1(17), 34–42.
Clare, I.C.H. & Gudjonsson, G.H. (1992). Devising and piloting a new ‘notice to detained
persons’. Royal Commission on Criminal Justice. London: HMSO.
Clare, I.C.H. & Gudjonsson, G.H. (1993). Interrogative suggestibility, confabulation, and
acquiescence in people with mild learning disabilities (mental handicap): implications
for reliability during police interrogations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology,
32(3), 295–301.
Clare, I.C.H. & Gudjonsson, G.H. (1995). The vulnerability of suspects with intellectual
disabilities during police interviews: a review and experimental study of decision
making. Mental Handicap Research, 8, 110–128.
Clare, I.C.H, Gudjonsson, G.H. & Harari, P.M. (1998). Understanding of the current
police caution (England and Wales). Journal of Community and Applied Social
Psychology, 8(5), 323–329.