14.01.2013 Views

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

364 A Psychology of <strong>Interrogations</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Confessions</strong><br />

did before (Gudjonsson, 1984a; Register & Kihlstrom, 1988). Typically Yield<br />

2 is about one or two points higher than Yield 1; a score of 13 or above falls<br />

outside the normal range.<br />

Yield 2 has been used in some of the more recent research with the GSS 1<br />

<strong>and</strong> GSS 2. It provides additional information in that it tells the examiner<br />

precisely how interrogative pressure, which is administered in the form<br />

of negative feedback, affects the subsequent susceptibility of the subject<br />

to suggestive questions. Yield 2 is more highly correlated with Shift than<br />

Yield 1 among normal subjects, forensic cases <strong>and</strong> children (Gudjonsson,<br />

1984a), which means that it gives a better indication than Yield 1 of the<br />

subjects’ vulnerability to yielding to leading questions when placed under<br />

interrogative pressure.<br />

6. Total Suggestibility. This is the sum of Yield 1 <strong>and</strong> Shift. This gives an<br />

indication of the subject’s overall level of suggestibility. The mean Total<br />

Suggestibility score for normal subjects is 7.5 on the GSS 1, with a st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

deviation of 4.6. This means that a score of 16 or above falls outside<br />

the normal range (i.e. 95th percentile rank). The mean score for forensic patients,<br />

which includes court referrals, is about 10 with a st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation<br />

of 6.<br />

7. Confabulation. Confabulation is the most recently developed measure of<br />

the GSS. It refers to problems in memory processing where people replace<br />

gaps in their memory with imaginary experiences that they believe to be<br />

true. Confabulation can be measured on the memory part of the GSS 1<br />

<strong>and</strong> GSS 2 stories. This includes major distortions in the story’s content or<br />

that pieces of information have been added to the story. Clare, Gudjonsson,<br />

Rutter <strong>and</strong> Cross (1994) classified confabulations on the GSS 2 into two<br />

distinct groups:<br />

� distortions, which represent a major change in the details of an existing<br />

‘idea’ (e.g. house mentioned instead of a bungalow, one boy instead of two<br />

boys) <strong>and</strong><br />

� fabrications, where a new or novel element is added to the narrative<br />

(e.g. introducing a name of a person or place not mentioned in the story).<br />

Distortions <strong>and</strong> fabrications are typically added to make up the total number<br />

of confabulations. For details about the scoring readers should read the GSS<br />

Manual (Gudjonsson, 1997a).<br />

Reliability<br />

The internal consistency of the 15 Yield 1 <strong>and</strong> 15 Shift items on the GSS 1<br />

was measured by Cronbach’s alpha for 195 subjects (Gudjonsson, 1984a). The<br />

coefficients were 0.77 <strong>and</strong> 0.67 for Yield 1 <strong>and</strong> Shift, respectively. Singh <strong>and</strong><br />

Gudjonsson (1987) recommended some modifications in the scoring of Shift,<br />

which increased the internal reliability of the measure to 0.71. This consisted<br />

of slight modification in the scoring of Shift <strong>and</strong> increased the number of items<br />

from 15 to 20. This means that a distinct change in the answers given after<br />

‘negative feedback’ applies to all the 20 items on the GSS 1, <strong>and</strong> not just to the<br />

15 ‘leading’ items, as had been used in the original work.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!