14.01.2013 Views

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

Interrogations-and-Confessions-Handbook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

452 A Psychology of <strong>Interrogations</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Confessions</strong><br />

confused; the ‘memory distrust syndrome’ had begun to set in. After having<br />

spent about two days in Brixton Prison on Rem<strong>and</strong>, she felt the pressure easing<br />

off <strong>and</strong> she began to gain complete confidence in her own recollection of events,<br />

particularly with regard to her innocence.<br />

Subsequent Developments<br />

It was alleged in a Panorama programme in 1990 that at the trial of the<br />

Guildford Four in 1975 <strong>and</strong> at the appeal in 1977 the prosecution withheld from<br />

the defence crucial forensic <strong>and</strong> alibi evidence, which might very well have altered<br />

the outcome of the trial had it been known to the jury. The ‘suppressed’<br />

forensic evidence linked the bombs that exploded in Guildford <strong>and</strong> Woolwich to<br />

several other bombs, which had exploded both before <strong>and</strong> after the Guildford<br />

<strong>and</strong> Woolwich bombs. It strongly indicated that all the bombs, 32 in total, had a<br />

‘common source of supply, information <strong>and</strong> expertise’. Furthermore, it pointed<br />

to the operation of a single IRA Unit operating on the mainl<strong>and</strong> of Britain. Some<br />

of the members of this Unit were known to the police <strong>and</strong> had been identified<br />

through fingerprints that had been discovered on bombs that had failed to explode.<br />

These had no known associations with the Guildford Four. The remaining<br />

unidentified fingerprints were not those of the Guildford Four, nor were they<br />

ever questioned about the other bombings.<br />

The other ‘new’ evidence allegedly suppressed by the prosecution relates to<br />

Gerry Conlon’s alibi. He had always maintained that at the time of the Guildford<br />

bombings he was in a Roman Catholic hostel in Kilburn, London, which is over<br />

30 miles away from Guildford. At his trial it was argued by the prosecution<br />

that Conlon’s alibi lacked corroboration. In fact, according to the Panorama<br />

programme, two independent witnesses had corroborated his statements to the<br />

police, but crucial evidence from one witness was withheld from the defence by<br />

the prosecution.<br />

THE BIRMINGHAM SIX<br />

On 21 November 1974, two public houses in Birmingham were bombed by<br />

the IRA. Twenty-one people were killed. Later that same night four Irishmen<br />

(Gerry Hunter, Richard McIlkenny, William Power & John Walker) were<br />

stopped for questioning as they were boarding a ferry to Irel<strong>and</strong>. They were<br />

asked to accompany the police to Morecambe police station for forensic tests.<br />

They happened to mention that one of their friends (Patrick Hill) had been travelling<br />

with them. Hill, who had already boarded the ferry, was arrested. The five<br />

men were subjected to a Greiss test by Dr Frank Skuse, a Home Office scientist.<br />

The method, named after the chemist who discovered it, was at the time thought<br />

to be a foolproof way of detecting nitroglycerine, which is a substance commonly<br />

found on people’s h<strong>and</strong>s if they have been h<strong>and</strong>ling explosives. Nitroglycerine<br />

was allegedly found on the h<strong>and</strong>s of two of the six men (Power & Hill).<br />

Dr Skuse told the police that he was 99% sure that two of the men had recently<br />

h<strong>and</strong>led commercial explosives (Mullin, 1989). The five men were travelling

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!