20.01.2013 Views

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

page. Stock-car racing had been <strong>the</strong> nation's fastest-growing sport for a decade, and<br />

NASCAR <strong>the</strong> second-most-watched sport behind <strong>the</strong> NFL. More Americans recognize<br />

<strong>the</strong> name Dale Earnhardt than, say, Maureen Dowd. (Manhattan liberals are dumbly<br />

blinking at that last sentence.) It took The New York Times two days to deem Earnhardt's<br />

death sufficiently important to mention it on <strong>the</strong> first page. Demonstrating <strong>the</strong> left's renowned<br />

populist touch, <strong>the</strong> article began, "His death brought a silence to <strong>the</strong> Wal-Mart."<br />

The Times went on to report that in vast swaths of <strong>the</strong> country people watch stock-car<br />

racing. Tacky people were mourning Dale Earnhardt all over <strong>the</strong> South!<br />

Pretty powerful indictment, I have to admit. No mention for two days! One small<br />

problem. Dale Earnhardt died on February 18, 2001. On February 19, 2001, which by my<br />

calculation is <strong>the</strong> next day, <strong>the</strong> Times ran a front-page account of Earnhardt's death written by<br />

sportswriter Robert Lipsyte under <strong>the</strong> headline: "Stock Car Star Killed on Last Lap of Daytona<br />

500." Here. Look at it.<br />

Frankly, I think <strong>the</strong> fact that The New York Times did have a front-page article on<br />

Dale Earnhardt <strong>the</strong> day after he died kind of undercuts her point that <strong>the</strong>y didn't. Don't you? I<br />

mean, if <strong>the</strong>y didn't, that would have been something, huh? But <strong>the</strong>y did.<br />

<strong>And</strong>, by <strong>the</strong> way, <strong>the</strong> article that Coulter refers to? The one written two days later? It<br />

was by Rick Bragg,' a Pulitzer Prize winner who grew up in Piedmont, Alabama. Boy, I hate<br />

those Piedmont snobs! It's always "Piedmont has <strong>the</strong> best this and Piedmont has <strong>the</strong> best<br />

that." Yeah, well, fuck you, Piedmont!<br />

Where did Ann Coulter come from? Well, she's a lawyer, one of <strong>the</strong> "elves" who<br />

helped Paula Jones go after Bill Clinton. That's a fea<strong>the</strong>r in her cap. She was born in 1961. Or<br />

1963. Depending on whe<strong>the</strong>r you believe her old Connecticut driver's license (1961) or her<br />

newer D.C. driver's license (1963). (The Washington Post looked into this.) Ann claims <strong>the</strong><br />

D.C. license is correct, which means that when she registered to vote she was sixteen. (The<br />

Post checked with <strong>the</strong> New Canaan, Connecticut, registrar's office.) That, of course, would be<br />

voter fraud.<br />

Ei<strong>the</strong>r way, she lied on at least one of her driver's licenses, a government I.D., which<br />

is a violation of federal law under <strong>the</strong> Patriot Act. I believe she could be locked up indefinitely<br />

for that without being allowed to talk to a lawyer or a judge. Or Paula Zahn.<br />

Now, lots of women lie about <strong>the</strong>ir age. But it raises a concern about Coulter (if that<br />

really is her name). Coulter's misstatements about her age make us question <strong>the</strong> veracity of<br />

<strong>the</strong> seemingly factual statements in her book, such as:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!