20.01.2013 Views

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>the</strong> much-hyped uranium from Niger, emanated from <strong>the</strong> highest reaches of <strong>the</strong> government.<br />

The question must be asked: What did <strong>the</strong> President know? <strong>And</strong>, if not, why didn't he know<br />

it? If, as may be <strong>the</strong> case, <strong>the</strong> President did not understand his intelligence briefings, why<br />

didn't he ask to have <strong>the</strong>m explained to him? <strong>And</strong> did he know that he didn't understand<br />

<strong>the</strong>m?<br />

When President Clinton left office, America enjoyed tremendous respect and admiration<br />

around <strong>the</strong> world. As a candidate, Bush repeatedly emphasized <strong>the</strong> need for humility in<br />

<strong>the</strong> conduct of our foreign affairs. What would he have done differently in Kosovo? Been<br />

more humble. How would he approach <strong>the</strong> Middle East? With humility.<br />

But as soon as he became president, Bush managed to spend Clinton's surplus of international<br />

goodwill in astonishingly short order. He ditched Kyoto, <strong>the</strong> anti-ballistic missile<br />

treaty, <strong>the</strong> germ warfare protocol to <strong>the</strong> Biological Weapons Convention, <strong>the</strong> Comprehensive<br />

Test Ban Treaty, <strong>the</strong> International Criminal Court, and <strong>the</strong> land mine treaty.<br />

<strong>And</strong> did it all with a decided lack of humility. He didn't say, "We hope you don't<br />

mind, we're very sorry, but we have to withdraw from <strong>the</strong> Kyoto Protocol. I feel terrible that<br />

we're not able to live up to our responsibility to take a leadership role in addressing <strong>the</strong> impending<br />

global warming crisis." Or something like that. I'm no diplomat. But <strong>the</strong>re must have<br />

been some way to be nicer about it.<br />

No. He had to go piss <strong>the</strong> world off. Not once. But twice. You see, <strong>the</strong> day after 9/11,<br />

we got <strong>the</strong> world back on our side. All over <strong>the</strong> planet, <strong>the</strong>re were spontaneous outpourings of<br />

sympathy, support, and genuine affection for <strong>the</strong> United States. It was a terrible way for it to<br />

happen. But it gave Bush a second start. Then he pissed <strong>the</strong>m all off again. His administration<br />

showed an almost reflexive contempt for even <strong>the</strong> idea of listening to <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> world.<br />

Like when Cheney told <strong>the</strong> world that he "didn't give a shit" (quotation marks mine) about<br />

weapons inspectors. <strong>And</strong> Bush's response to whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> largest simultaneous antiwar protests<br />

in human history had made any sort of impression on him. "Size of protest," he said, "it's<br />

like deciding, well, I'm going to decide policy based upon a focus group." A ten-millionperson<br />

focus group.<br />

Several months ago, I saw former President Clinton on CSPAN giving a speech about<br />

globalization to <strong>the</strong> Council on Foreign Relations. He spoke for a couple of hours, with just a<br />

few notes, displaying an incredible depth and breadth of understanding. In a way, it made me<br />

miss him.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!