20.01.2013 Views

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

prise. Raising taxes and increasing government spending is a surefire way to continue<br />

<strong>the</strong> economic doldrums. I'll back up that statement with my own story. Right<br />

now, I'm a busy guy, with TV, radio, books, a syndicated column, and a website.<br />

There are scores of people working with me, people who are making money and<br />

supporting <strong>the</strong>ir families. As I have mentioned, when my tax obligation is all added<br />

up, <strong>the</strong> government takes a bit more than 50 cents of every dollar I earn. <strong>And</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Democrats want more. [I have no clue who he was talking about.) But I will tell you<br />

what. If my tax rate increases, I will cut back and do fewer things. It simply will not<br />

be worth my time, because I have enough money saved to live comfortably. I don't<br />

need to kill myself to pay <strong>the</strong> government. <strong>And</strong> if I do cut back, some of <strong>the</strong> people<br />

currently earning money under <strong>the</strong> Factor banner will stop earning that money.<br />

The thought of O'Reilly cutting back is a frightening one. Not just for <strong>the</strong> employees he'd let<br />

go, and <strong>the</strong>ir families, who would suddenly have <strong>the</strong> wolf at <strong>the</strong>ir door. What scares me is <strong>the</strong><br />

prospect that we could be deprived of thoughtful Talking Points like this one. Or that we'd<br />

see <strong>the</strong>m only on TV, and not also get <strong>the</strong>m on radio, in his syndicated column, and on his<br />

website. It's enough to make me want to fight for fur<strong>the</strong>r tax cuts for <strong>the</strong> five-million-and-up<br />

bracket, even if it means that we'd have to cut back on Head Start and prenatal care for <strong>the</strong><br />

poor.<br />

It's also good to know that O'Reilly has enough money saved to live comfortably and<br />

that <strong>the</strong> only reason he's working so hard is pure greed.<br />

In fairness. Bill is probably working extra hard so that his children can inherit enough<br />

money to live extravagantly without ever having to work or challenge <strong>the</strong>mselves. That, of<br />

course, is every parent's dream.<br />

<strong>And</strong> now, thanks to <strong>the</strong> visionary who coined <strong>the</strong> terrifying phrase "death tax" to describe<br />

<strong>the</strong> eminently reasonable estate tax, more Americans than ever will be able to see that<br />

dream come true. In 2001, Congress endorsed <strong>the</strong> deeply American idea of a permanent aristocracy<br />

bypassing a phase-out, and eventual repeal, of <strong>the</strong> estate tax.<br />

As Bush said in his acceptance speech: "On principle, every family, every farmer and<br />

small business person should be free to pass on <strong>the</strong>ir life's work to those <strong>the</strong>y love. So we<br />

abolish <strong>the</strong> death tax."<br />

By this "principle," every elementary school teacher should be able to pass on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

life's work to <strong>the</strong> people <strong>the</strong>y love. They should be able to pass on <strong>the</strong> lives <strong>the</strong>y've touched,<br />

<strong>the</strong> children <strong>the</strong>y've inspired, <strong>the</strong> futures <strong>the</strong>y've changed. Logistically speaking, that would

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!