20.01.2013 Views

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sources and methods" and "inhibits our ability to find and deal with <strong>the</strong> terrorists who commit<br />

this kind of act." Thanks, Orrin.<br />

So if it hadn't been for Hatch, we probably would've gotten bin Laden right away. The<br />

disclosure that al Qaeda was responsible did allow Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA)<br />

to identify <strong>the</strong> "root of <strong>the</strong> problem" just hours after <strong>the</strong> attack: "We had Bill Clinton backing<br />

off, letting <strong>the</strong> Taliban go, over and over again." The right-wing media followed suit. The<br />

Washington Times blamed Clinton. The New York Post blamed Clinton. You know who Rush<br />

Limbaugh blamed? Clinton. The National Review's White House correspondent Byron York<br />

wrote that Clinton's "record is a richly detailed manual of how not to conduct a war on terrorism."<br />

Within two days, Newt Gingrich was blaming Clinton for <strong>the</strong> attacks because of his<br />

"pa<strong>the</strong>tically weak, ineffective ability to focus and stay focused." You really got to give Gingrich<br />

credit for how hard he tried to disrupt Clinton's focus: His Republican-run House conducted<br />

dozens of hostile investigations against <strong>the</strong> President.<br />

But it had kind of been a waste of Gingrich's time. Clinton, as I will demonstrate below,<br />

focused more on terrorism than any previous president. A month before Clinton left office,<br />

his administration was praised by two former Reagan counterterrorism officials. "Overall,<br />

I give <strong>the</strong>m very high marks," Robert Oakley, who served as ambassador for counterterrorism<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Reagan State Department, told <strong>the</strong> Washington Post. "The only major criticism I<br />

have is <strong>the</strong> obsession with Osama, which made him stronger." Oakley's successor in <strong>the</strong><br />

Reagan administration, Paul Bremer, disagreed slightly. Bremer, who is currently <strong>the</strong> civilian<br />

administrator in Iraq, told <strong>the</strong> Post he believed <strong>the</strong> Clinton administration had "correctly focused<br />

on bin Laden." Notice <strong>the</strong> word "focused" next to <strong>the</strong> words "on bin Laden." I'm talking<br />

to you, Newt. <strong>And</strong> all of you "Blame-Clinton-Firsters."<br />

Right-wingers like to call us <strong>the</strong> "Blame-America-First Crowd." But <strong>the</strong>y've blamed<br />

Clinton, who's not just an American, but was <strong>the</strong> President, virtually nonstop. <strong>And</strong> Clinton<br />

was not just <strong>the</strong> President. He was <strong>the</strong> last elected president, who received more votes than<br />

any o<strong>the</strong>r candidate running against him. In two straight elections! So who's blaming America?<br />

The left, which is blaming <strong>the</strong> terrorists? Or <strong>the</strong> right, which is blaming a twice-elected<br />

President of <strong>the</strong> United States?<br />

But, you know what, I don't want to get into a whole partisan politics thing here. Not<br />

in this book, anyway. We'll leave that for my next book, I Fucking Hate Those Right-Wing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!