Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Funny thing happened at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> Senate debate on this issue. Republicans, who<br />
knew <strong>the</strong>y had <strong>the</strong> votes to win, kept spouting off about family farms and small businesses.<br />
So <strong>the</strong> Democrats gave <strong>the</strong>m a chance to prove <strong>the</strong>ir sincerity. Instead of abolishing <strong>the</strong> estate<br />
tax altoge<strong>the</strong>r, how about exempting <strong>the</strong> first $4 million per couple? Nope. How 'bout <strong>the</strong><br />
first $8 million? Sorry.<br />
Okay. Then how about this? Russ Feingold, Democrat of Wisconsin, offered an<br />
amendment that would exempt <strong>the</strong> first one hundred million dollars of a couple's net worth<br />
before a penny of estate taxes were paid. This would exempt all "family farms" and "small<br />
businesses" worth less than $100 million.<br />
The amendment went down 48-51. 1<br />
In all this talk, one thing that gets lost is that <strong>the</strong>re are forty-two million working Americans<br />
who have not gotten one cent in tax cuts. The Wall Street Journal refers to <strong>the</strong>m as "lucky<br />
duckies" because <strong>the</strong>y earn so little that <strong>the</strong>y don't pay any income taxes. Many lucky duckies<br />
are deeply in debt to predatory lenders. Many of <strong>the</strong>se lucky duckies couldn't afford college<br />
and cannot afford health insurance. Some of <strong>the</strong>se lucky duckies, working Americans, will be<br />
homeless sometime during <strong>the</strong> year. Their children, <strong>the</strong> lucky ducklings, are far more likely<br />
than my kids, or Paul Gigot's, to be killed violently or die of a preventable disease.<br />
Apparently, <strong>the</strong> Wall Street journal thinks that <strong>the</strong> unluckiest thing in <strong>the</strong> world is<br />
paying taxes.<br />
That's why <strong>the</strong>y have been such vociferous supporters of <strong>the</strong> Bush tax cuts, more than<br />
half of which will eventually go to <strong>the</strong> top 1 percent of families.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> last thirty years, those families saw <strong>the</strong>ir after-tax incomes rise 157 percent. The<br />
top one percent have incomes starting at $230,000. Their share of <strong>the</strong> national income has<br />
doubled, and is now as large as <strong>the</strong> combined income of <strong>the</strong> bottom 40 percent. The thirteen<br />
thousand families at <strong>the</strong> very top have almost as much in come as <strong>the</strong> poorest twenty million<br />
households in America, which is like <strong>the</strong> population of Bemidji, Minnesota, (home of Paul<br />
Bunyan) having more income than <strong>the</strong> country's six largest cities—New York City, Los Angeles,<br />
Chicago, Houston, Philadelphia, and Phoenix—combined.<br />
1<br />
Kudos to Republicans who voted for <strong>the</strong> Feingold amendment: Chafee, Collins, Hutchison, McCain,<br />
Snowe, and Specter. Huge raspberries to <strong>the</strong> Democrats who crossed over: Baucus, Breaux, Cleland, Lincoln,<br />
Miller, Nelson of Florida, Nelson of Nebraska, and Wyden. Semi-kudos to Stevens of Alaska who did not vote.