20.01.2013 Views

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

On <strong>the</strong> Hannity and Colmes episode immediately following <strong>the</strong> last State of <strong>the</strong> Union address,<br />

Sean Hannity described <strong>the</strong> President's 2003 tax plan (which contained Bush's third tax<br />

cut) in his confident, unequivocal way: "Ninety-two million Americans will get $1,100 back<br />

in <strong>the</strong>ir pocket."<br />

Of course, he was lying. Or was he? Maybe he was just confused. Sean may be evil,<br />

but he's not smart. I don't dispute that ninety-two million Americans were getting an average<br />

tax cut of $1,083. It's not <strong>the</strong> seventeen bucks I'm quibbling about. It's <strong>the</strong> average part. Hannity<br />

had left that out. Averages can be tricky. You and Bill Gates probably have an average<br />

net worth of $32 billion. My daughter and I have an average gender of half-male, half-female.<br />

My daughter, my wife, and I have an average gender of female.<br />

In fact, less than twenty-five million Americans would be receiving a tax cut of<br />

$1,100 or more. Sixty-two million taxpayers would be getting tax cuts of less than a thousand<br />

dollars-averaging about $302. <strong>And</strong> fifty million households would get no tax cut at all.<br />

us."<br />

Colmes's next comment on that show was "Peggy [Noonan], thank you for being with<br />

Personally, I think <strong>the</strong> President, like most Americans, is smarter than Sean Hannity. So<br />

when Bush, who, after all, is President of <strong>the</strong> United States, repeatedly says something that<br />

isn't true, it's not confusion. It's a lie.<br />

Take <strong>the</strong>se remarks by <strong>the</strong> President at a 2001 "Tax Family Event," in which he introduced<br />

America to <strong>the</strong> Yahngs. Talking about his first tax plan, <strong>the</strong> President of <strong>the</strong> United<br />

States said,<br />

It is a plan that significantly reduces taxes for people at <strong>the</strong> bottom end of <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

ladder. If you're a family of four making $35,000, you'll receive a one hundred<br />

percent tax cut. It's an average tax relief for families of $1,600. The Yahng<br />

family under <strong>the</strong> plan I submit will receive actually more than that. They now pay<br />

$2,000 in taxes to <strong>the</strong> federal government. If this plan is enacted by <strong>the</strong> United<br />

States Congress, <strong>the</strong>y'll end up paying $150 of taxes.<br />

There are actually four lies crammed into this little paragraph. Lie #1 is <strong>the</strong> "one hundred<br />

percent tax cut" part of <strong>the</strong> second sentence. The President could have told <strong>the</strong> truth by saying,<br />

"one hundred percent income tax cut." You see, a family of four making $35,000 pays,<br />

on average, $5,355 in payroll taxes. Seventy-four percent of Americans pay more in payroll

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!