20.01.2013 Views

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

"All I know is that's what he told reporters in<br />

Tennessee"<br />

Funded <strong>the</strong> Internet, which changed history<br />

forever<br />

"By far <strong>the</strong> vast majority of my tax cuts<br />

go to those at <strong>the</strong> bottom end of <strong>the</strong><br />

spectrum"<br />

Snorted cocaine, dodged draft, drove<br />

drunk into a hedge<br />

In o<strong>the</strong>r words, both candidates made serious mistakes and legitimate questions could have<br />

been raised about <strong>the</strong>ir fitness for national office. Why <strong>the</strong>n did Bush get twice as many positive<br />

stories and so many fewer negative stories? Hummus. That's right. Remember <strong>the</strong> oil in<br />

<strong>the</strong> hummus?<br />

It's <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r biases that killed Gore. Pack mentality. Once <strong>the</strong> pack had decided <strong>the</strong><br />

story line on Gore, everybody jumped aboard and rode all <strong>the</strong> way to November. Also, laziness.<br />

That's a biiiiig bias. Why bo<strong>the</strong>r to check facts when you can quote yesterday's story<br />

about a story that ran <strong>the</strong> day before yesterday?<br />

Negativity. What's more likely to hit <strong>the</strong> front page? Gore <strong>Tell</strong>s Inspirational Story to<br />

High Schoolers? Or Gore <strong>Lies</strong> Again? Plus, Bush was a new story. Gore was old. <strong>And</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

media just didn't like Gore. <strong>And</strong> by attacking him, reporters were safe from <strong>the</strong> accusation of<br />

having a liberal bias. Or were <strong>the</strong>y?<br />

Writing in <strong>the</strong> Charleston Gazette, Dan Radmacher cited a study by Howard Kurtz<br />

that found almost twice as many pro-Bush stories as pro-Gore stories on <strong>the</strong> front page of The<br />

New York Times during <strong>the</strong> campaign. An incredulous Ann Coulter could find only one explanation<br />

for a liberal newspaper implying a conservative bias in <strong>the</strong> Times: "The sheer joy<br />

liberals take in telling lies ... They take insolent pleasure in saying absurd things."<br />

I called Radmacher at his Charleston, West Virginia, office. Tearn<strong>Franken</strong> transcribed<br />

<strong>the</strong> conversation.<br />

AL: Hi, Dan. It's AI <strong>Franken</strong>. Did you know that Ann Coulter referred to one of your columns in<br />

her book?<br />

DAN RADMACHER: Really?<br />

AL: It was <strong>the</strong> one where you cited Howard Kurtz's study on media coverage during <strong>the</strong> election.<br />

DAN: Oh God. What did she say?<br />

AL: That's actually why I'm calling. She said that your column shows that liberals take sheer<br />

joy in telling lies. So I wanted to ask you: Do you take sheer joy in telling lies?<br />

DAN: Yes. Yes, I do.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!