You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
solute sham" and accused <strong>the</strong> Democrats of "exploit[ing] Wellstone's memory totally, completely<br />
and shamelessly for political gain."<br />
This seemed almost surreally dishonest. I flipped to <strong>the</strong> real story and read an excerpt<br />
from <strong>the</strong> eulogies. This one from Paul and Sheila's younger son, Mark:<br />
The one thing that comes to mind when I think about my dad is how proud he was<br />
of everybody around him and how he wanted to shed light on everybody's accomplishments.<br />
It was never about him. It was never about Paul Wellstone. It was about<br />
<strong>the</strong> ideal; it was about <strong>the</strong> dream he had. . . . More than anything I just have a message<br />
to my dad. The message to my dad is, "Dad, we're okay. Dave and I are okay.<br />
The thousands and thousands of people that you left behind that care about you,<br />
we are okay. We will carry on. . . ." These are some of his favorite words that he<br />
ever spoke . . . "Never separate <strong>the</strong> lives you live from <strong>the</strong> words you speak."<br />
That doesn't sound like a complete, total, absolute sham. In fact, it hardly sounds like a sham<br />
at all. That sounds like <strong>the</strong> kind of eulogy a fa<strong>the</strong>r would love from his son. (Hear that, Joe?)<br />
When I called Vin Weber to research this chapter, I asked him whe<strong>the</strong>r he had<br />
watched <strong>the</strong> whole event and whe<strong>the</strong>r he had seen any of <strong>the</strong> eulogies. He said, "Yeah, <strong>the</strong>re<br />
was some very nice stuff." This candid Vin was a refreshing break from <strong>the</strong> lying Vin who<br />
talked to <strong>the</strong> Star Tribune in 2002. But <strong>Lying</strong> Vin had planted <strong>the</strong> story line: The memorial<br />
was a total sham, a political charade.<br />
Going back to <strong>the</strong> lie story in <strong>the</strong> Star Tribune, I found a gem from a local Republican<br />
apparatchik.<br />
Republican political analyst and lobbyist Sarah Janacek said that what she found<br />
most outrageous were <strong>the</strong> screens inside Williams Arena prompting audience reaction—when<br />
to laugh and how loudly to clap.<br />
Janacek was referring to <strong>the</strong> closed captioning that <strong>the</strong> memorial's organizers had thoughtfully<br />
provided for <strong>the</strong> hearing impaired. Janacek, perhaps, was thinking impaired. Or, more<br />
likely, honesty impaired. On radio, she said that <strong>the</strong> text on <strong>the</strong> Jumbotrons was proof positive<br />
that <strong>the</strong> entire event had been scripted. She didn't mention that words appeared on <strong>the</strong><br />
screen about five seconds after <strong>the</strong>y had been spoken.<br />
Janacek's insanely stupid and/or viciously dishonest claim was repeated over and over<br />
on local right-wing talk radio. But what's a local lie when you can have a national lie? On C-<br />
SPAN'S Washington Journal that morning, Kellyanne Fitzpatrick Conway, one of <strong>the</strong> Repub-