20.01.2013 Views

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

Franken-Lies-And-the-Lying-Liars-Who-Tell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

solute sham" and accused <strong>the</strong> Democrats of "exploit[ing] Wellstone's memory totally, completely<br />

and shamelessly for political gain."<br />

This seemed almost surreally dishonest. I flipped to <strong>the</strong> real story and read an excerpt<br />

from <strong>the</strong> eulogies. This one from Paul and Sheila's younger son, Mark:<br />

The one thing that comes to mind when I think about my dad is how proud he was<br />

of everybody around him and how he wanted to shed light on everybody's accomplishments.<br />

It was never about him. It was never about Paul Wellstone. It was about<br />

<strong>the</strong> ideal; it was about <strong>the</strong> dream he had. . . . More than anything I just have a message<br />

to my dad. The message to my dad is, "Dad, we're okay. Dave and I are okay.<br />

The thousands and thousands of people that you left behind that care about you,<br />

we are okay. We will carry on. . . ." These are some of his favorite words that he<br />

ever spoke . . . "Never separate <strong>the</strong> lives you live from <strong>the</strong> words you speak."<br />

That doesn't sound like a complete, total, absolute sham. In fact, it hardly sounds like a sham<br />

at all. That sounds like <strong>the</strong> kind of eulogy a fa<strong>the</strong>r would love from his son. (Hear that, Joe?)<br />

When I called Vin Weber to research this chapter, I asked him whe<strong>the</strong>r he had<br />

watched <strong>the</strong> whole event and whe<strong>the</strong>r he had seen any of <strong>the</strong> eulogies. He said, "Yeah, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

was some very nice stuff." This candid Vin was a refreshing break from <strong>the</strong> lying Vin who<br />

talked to <strong>the</strong> Star Tribune in 2002. But <strong>Lying</strong> Vin had planted <strong>the</strong> story line: The memorial<br />

was a total sham, a political charade.<br />

Going back to <strong>the</strong> lie story in <strong>the</strong> Star Tribune, I found a gem from a local Republican<br />

apparatchik.<br />

Republican political analyst and lobbyist Sarah Janacek said that what she found<br />

most outrageous were <strong>the</strong> screens inside Williams Arena prompting audience reaction—when<br />

to laugh and how loudly to clap.<br />

Janacek was referring to <strong>the</strong> closed captioning that <strong>the</strong> memorial's organizers had thoughtfully<br />

provided for <strong>the</strong> hearing impaired. Janacek, perhaps, was thinking impaired. Or, more<br />

likely, honesty impaired. On radio, she said that <strong>the</strong> text on <strong>the</strong> Jumbotrons was proof positive<br />

that <strong>the</strong> entire event had been scripted. She didn't mention that words appeared on <strong>the</strong><br />

screen about five seconds after <strong>the</strong>y had been spoken.<br />

Janacek's insanely stupid and/or viciously dishonest claim was repeated over and over<br />

on local right-wing talk radio. But what's a local lie when you can have a national lie? On C-<br />

SPAN'S Washington Journal that morning, Kellyanne Fitzpatrick Conway, one of <strong>the</strong> Repub-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!