21.04.2021 Views

Revista UNINPAHU No 9

Revista de investigación UNINPAHU No 9

Revista de investigación UNINPAHU No 9

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 Pp 23 - 31. Nº 9, octubre de 2013<br />

en serio toda la investigación y todo. Entonces<br />

fue como un gran avance.” 11 (Final Interview)<br />

It is significant the way in which these<br />

students experienced the touch of the past.<br />

Josefina declares that seeing the telegram<br />

was a confirmation that Saturio’s story was<br />

real because until that point she, like other<br />

students, still thought it was an invented story,<br />

“algo imaginario” 12 . In Josefina’s case the touch<br />

of the past becomes more a substantiation, an<br />

evidential rather than a sensory experience.<br />

The reality of the past is revealed here through<br />

a personal and factual contact with a proof<br />

from the past that talks about concrete events<br />

taking place in specific times and places. In<br />

other words, to see the telegram translates into<br />

a validation of Saturio’s account, proof for the<br />

students that Saturio’s life really took place in<br />

a space and time. I suggest interpreting this<br />

turn as an acceptance of Saturio’s historical<br />

existence, that his life was part of the social<br />

time of the human, and more specifically part<br />

of our collective past.<br />

Similarly, Mercedes remarks that they did not<br />

even believe the telegram existed, but instead<br />

it was made up. Carlos recalls that clearing up<br />

doubts about the existence and truth of our<br />

drama-remembrance process pre-text, Saturio’s<br />

story, helped the research. Both students<br />

highlight the positive consequence of this<br />

discovery in the development of their research.<br />

It helped to move the project on; “fue como un<br />

gran avance” 13 . It is telling to realize that at this<br />

level, at this point of the research, after all our<br />

previous drama exploration work, they did<br />

not yet believe the telegram and Saturio’s story<br />

happened and hence had historical existence.<br />

Reflecting on this, I think that for students<br />

to confirm that the telegram and Saturio’s<br />

story were historically real was important in<br />

terms of the formation of a public memory<br />

consciousness. Finding out that Saturio was<br />

real, that his story and life events took place<br />

in a specific location and time span of our<br />

collective memory, was important not only as<br />

meaningful historical knowledge but in terms<br />

of the historical awareness this knowledge<br />

generates. This is an important point in regard<br />

to the work of memory understood in terms of<br />

recovering of the past, overcoming historical<br />

oblivion and the formation of a critical historical<br />

consciousness; “nos tomamos mas en serio toda la<br />

investigación”. 14<br />

There were other trajectories within which<br />

Montessori students experienced the touch<br />

of the past during their visit to the Colombian<br />

History Archive. Other participants took<br />

different directions, different routes in their<br />

encounter with the paths of the past: learning<br />

through the past. Learning through the past is<br />

a pedagogical experience that involves both the<br />

learning of the past and the learning from the<br />

past. We learn about the past when we get to<br />

know the events of the past and when we pay<br />

attention to the telling of the past.<br />

Important history and disciplinary learning,<br />

powerful encounters with traces of the past,<br />

and deep individual and collective involvement<br />

constituted the main pedagogical components<br />

of the Colombian National History Archive<br />

experience. Alvaro, 16 years old, and Beatriz,<br />

15 years old, commented:<br />

(11) “It meant so much cause to have the opportunity to take in our hands the telegram was so strange, cause we never<br />

thought we could have the telegram like that, we always saw it in photocopies and you gave it to us but we never had<br />

it right there in our hands, we never thought like holding it, to tell the truth. Simply we thought it was just a photocopy<br />

and that’s it. And most of us didn’t believe that it was written by someone, instead that it was just invented. To tell the<br />

truth we didn’t even think the telegram was real. When we could see it and everything at the National Archive, well it<br />

was different because we then took more seriously the research and everything. It was like a big advance”.<br />

(12) “something imaginary”<br />

(13) “it was like a big advance”<br />

(14) “we then took more seriously the research”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!