Inkubatorer i Sverige - Analys av indikatordimensioner ... - Vinnova

Stabell, C. B. och Fjeldstad, Ö. D., 1998, Configuring value for competitiveadvantage: on chains, shops, and network. Strategic Management Journal.19, 413-437.Steffen. R., 1992, What the incubators have hatched, Planning, 58 (5), 28-30.Stoneman. P., 1983, ”The Economic Analysis of Technological Change”,Oxford University Press, London.Storey, D.J., 1994, Understanding the small business sector, Routledge,London.Storey, D. J., Keasy, K., Watson, R. och Wynarczyk, D., 1987, The performanceof small firms. Croomhelm, London.Teece, D. J., 1986, Profiting from technological innovation: Implications forintegration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15,285-305.Terpstra, D.E. och Olson, P.D., 1993, Entrepreneurial start-up and growth:A classification of problems, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,Spring, 5-20.Tesfaye, B., 1993, Determinants of entrepreneurial processes: a case studyof technology based spin-of company formation, Ph.D. Diss., Stockholmsuniversitet, Stockholm.Utterback, J. M. och Reitberger, G., 1982, ”Technology and Industrial Innovationin Sweden; A Study of New Technology-Based Firms”, STU, Stockholm.Tether, B. S. och Metcalfe, J. S.,. 2004. Services and systems of innovation.In Sectoral Systems of Innovation, edited by Franco Malerba. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Thompson, H. 2002, Reflexiva intervjuer. Studentlitteratur, Lund.Tsoukas, H., 1989, The Validity of Ideographic Research Explanations.The Academy of Management Review,14 (4).Tyler, B. B., 2001, The complementary of cooperative and technologicalcompetencies: a resource-based perspective. Journal of Engineering andTechnology Management, 18, 1-27.Uzzi, B., 1996, The source and consequences of embeddness for the economicperformance of organizations: the network effect. American SociologicalReview (August), 61, 674-698.140